Page 63 - CONFERENCE BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENDER, CULTURE AND SOCIETY (ICGCS) 2021
P. 63

CONFERENCE PROGRAM AND                                                                                                                                          ICGCS 2021

           ABSTRACT BOOK





       Gender and Family




            Criminalization of Child Victims of Rape in Qanun Jinayat


            (Study on the Decision of the Sharia Court Number


            10/JN/2020/MS-LSK)





                      Nursiti, Roslaini Ramli, Anta Rini Utami


                       Universitas Syiah Kuala





                       This     paper      aims      to    describe       a   court      decision        that    is   discriminatory           and     opens       up     opportunities          for
                       criminalization  of  child  victims  of  rape.  The  research  method  used  is  qualitative  research  with  a  normative

                       juridical       approach.         The      primary        legal     material        used      is   the     Decision         of   the     Sharia       Court      Number
                       10/JN/2020/MS.LSK               and     the   relevant       legislation      used      for   analysis.     The    results     of   the   analysis      show     that    the
                       problem         began      when       the    Public      Prosecutor        decided        to   use    Aceh      Qanun        Number         6   of   2014    concerning

                       Jinayat  to  resolve  this  case  and  ignore  the  Child  Protection  Act.  The  Public  Prosecutor  was  considered  not  to
                       be    careful     in   preparing        the    indictment         letter    in   the   form      of   alternative      charges,       with     the    first   indictment

                       being  rape  of  a  child  (Article  50),  the  second  indictment  of  adultery  with  a  child  (Article  34)  and  the  third
                       charge       of   sexual     abuse      against      a   child  (Article      47).   Mixing      the    qualifications         of   criminal      acts    involving      the

                       perpetrator-victim  relationship  (rape  and  sexual  harassment)  with  adultery  which  is  classified  as  a  crime  that
                       is   carried     out    voluntarily       between         the    two     parties     is   not   appropriate.          The    next     mistake       is   when      what     is

                       demanded  in  the  Requisitoir  is  the  crime  of  adultery  with  children.  This  decision  is  very  impartial  to  the  child
                       because  in  the  case  of  adultery,  the  child  victim  can  also  be  positioned  as  the  perpetrator,  can  be  processed
                       by  law  and  be  subject  to  'uqubat  (sanctions).  The  culmination  of  the  error  is  when  the  panel  of  judges  does

                       not    at   all   use    the    perspective         of   child    victims      in   their    considerations.           That     the    panel     of   judges      did    not
                       consider  the  age  of  the  victim,  who  was  only  13  years  old,  had  only  been  acquainted  with  the  Defendant  for  a

                       week  and  had  met  for  the  first  time  on  the  night  of  the  incident,  had  intended  to  commit  adultery  in  the
                       middle  of  the  night  in  a  dark  atmosphere  in  the  middle  of  a  palm  oil  plantation.  The  Defendant's  statement
                       that  between  himself  and  the  child  victim  has  a  courtship  relation,  and  has  a  relationship  based  on  love  and

                       consensual,  cannot  be  used  as  a  basis  that  the  intercourse  that  occurred  was  adultery,  not  rape.  Moreover,
                       the  juridical  facts  show  that  the  victim  suffered  many  wounds  and  abrasions  as  well  as  a  torn  hymen.  The

                       Public  Prosecutor  and  the  panel  of  judges  should  consider  this  case  as  child  rape.  The  indictment  should
                       clearly  describe  the  lure  and  persuasion  carried  out  by  the  defendant  which  could  be  part  of  the  coercive

                       element  in  Article  50  of  the  Qanun  Jinayat.  The  imposition  of  a  crime  under  Article  34  of  the  Qanun  Jinayat
                       also  results  in  the  victim  losing  the  opportunity  to  claim  the  right  of  restitution  even  though  in  the  provisions

                       of   Article      51   of   the    Qanun        Jinayat,      the    defendant          who      can     be    subject      to    restitution       sanctions        is   the
                       perpetrator  of  rape.  If  using  the  Child  Protection  Act,  this  case  can  be  strictly  punished  using  Article  76D  in
                       conjunction  with  Article  81  of  Law  Number  35  of  2014  as  an  act  of  forcing  a  child  to  have  intercourse.  Several

                       considerations           that    should      have     been      considered         by   the    public      prosecutor        in   using     the   legal     basis    of   the
                       child  protection  law  are,  first:  the  Child  Protection  Act  is  a  special  law  that  makes  children  the  subject  of  its

                       regulation,  so  that  the  policies  regulated  in  it  become  more  comprehensive.  Second:  the  sanctions  regulated
                       in   the    Child     Protection        Act     are   much       more       severe     than     the     Qanun       Jinayat.      Third:    the    use     of   the   Child

                       Protection  Law  will  be  under  the  authority  of  the  General  Court.  The  Juvenile  Justice  System  implemented  in
                       the  District  Court  is  much  better  than  the  implementation  in  the  Sharia  Court.  The  number  of  judges  with

                       child  certification  is  still  very  limited  in  the  Sharia  Court.  Work  facilities  to  support  the  implementation  of
                       child  trials  in  accordance  with  the  juvenile  criminal  justice  system  are  also  not  yet  available.  Based  on  these
                       considerations,           the    Public     Prosecutor         should      not    use    the    Qanun        Jinayat      to   resolve     child     cases,    especially

                       those related to sexual violence.






                         Keywords: Indictment Letter, Adultery with a Child, Rape of a Child, Sexual Abuse
                         Against a Child

                         Short Biography:


                         Nursiti,  SH,  M.Hum              is   a   lecturer     at   the   Faculty      of   Law     of   Syiah     Kuala     University       with     qualifications         in
                         criminal  law.  Subjects  covered  are  Criminal  Law,  Criminal  Procedure  Law,  Criminal  Case  Study,  Criminal

                         Law     on    Public     Security,       Penitentiary         Law,     Criminology          and     the    Criminal       Justice      System.       In   doing      the
                         teaching  and  learning  process  emphasizes  the  ability  of  students  to  think  logically  and  put  the  values  of

                         truth  and  equality  as  a  guide  in  thinking  and  acting.  Have  a  high  interest  in  legal  protection  issues  for
                         women and children. She therefore tends to use gender analysis to analyse policies and cases.
                         Roslaini  Ramli,  was  born  in  Lancang  Barat  (Aceh  Utara)  on  February  1966.  She  work  as  lecturer  at  Law

                         Faculty     Syiah     Kuala      University       since     March      1,   1993.   She    has    completed          her    postgraduate           at   Syiah    Kuala
                         University in 2007. Since 2005 she has joined as the administrator of the Gender Research Center and have

                         good  ability  to  do  gender  analysis.  At  this  time  one  of  lectures  that  she  teaches  is  about  law  and  gender
                         study.
                         Anta  Rini  Utami            was     born     in   Banda       Aceh,     Aceh,      on    24th    December           1986.    She     received       her    bachelor


                         degree  from  Law  Faculty  of  Syiah  Kuala  University  in  2008  and  obtained  her  master  degree  in  Law  from

                         the  same  university  in  2016.  Her  journal  article  “The  criminal  responsibility  of  a  notary  official  for  criminal
                         acts of falsifying authentic deeds” was published at Syiah Kuala University in 2016. She worked in private
                         sectors     after    graduated          and     in   2019    she    passed       the    civil   servant      exam       as   a   lecturer     at   Law     faculty     in

                         University of Syiah Kuala





                                                                                                                                                                                                 62


           h t t p : / / i c g c s . c o n f e r e n c e . u n a n d . a c . i d /
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68