Page 71 - AREA II-Faculty-BSN-Program Performance Profile

2. IMPLEMENTATION

⮚ Describe the Programs Faculty workload system including the administrative and other quasi assignments
with equivalent teaching-load (ETL) and its process of equitable and fair distribution of workload along the
following;
● Adherence to the provision of the approved policies/guidelines on faculty Workload;
● Compatibility of specializations/experience on teaching assignments; and
● Substitution/remedial policies (whenever a faculty is on leave/on or on official business)

The required workload of a faculty member shall be in accordance with the approved workload guidelines which
can be earned by teaching or combination of teaching and other activities in connection with research, extension,
administrative work, and other quasi-teaching activities. The Dean and the Program Chair/Department Chair determine
the compatibility of specialization or experience on teaching assignments. This is usually based on educational preparation
and experience in the field or subject needed.

A workload scheme had been established to serve as a guide in assigning teaching loads as well as other related
t
duties. Faculty members are expected to carry a regular or minimum workload of 21 units of eaching loads per week or
21 units of combined workload. In excess of the normal workload, a faculty shall be paid excess load subject to existing rules
and policies and availability of funds.

Whenever a faculty will go on leave or on official business, the Department Chair/Program Chair should be
duly notified. This will ensure that a substitute teacher or a remedial class be scheduled. In case a substitute teacher is not
available, a remedial class must be conducted by the faculty concern upon return to work notifying the Department Chair or
Program Chair and the Dean through writing about the said conduct of remedial class.

⮚ Describe other issues/concerns on Faculty Workload System and its implementation (if any).

NONE

3. OUTCOMES
⮚ Illustrate the congruence of faculty loading with compliance of faculty to all academic policies such as timely
submission of required academic reports.

The regular or minimum workload for faculty members is 21. Faculty members were still given time
to do research and extension as well as production activities. The required academic reports were submitted
on time by the faculty members as reflected in their IPCR.

l
⮚ Cite all activities to show that faculty are effective and efficient as a result of effective faculty oading. The
following instructional activities shows the effective and efficient result of effective faculty loading:

Faculty members were given citations, recognitions and awards for their best performance in instruction,
research and extension. Even though most of the faculty members were given administrative designations and given more
than the minimum number of course preparations, still, their performance evaluation ranges from “Very Satisfactory” to
“Outstanding.”
4. BEST PRACTICES
⮚ Cite as many best practices as you can on Parameter C such as effective and efficient faculty loading.
The following are the best practices on faculty loading:
Loading of subjects of faculty members were congruent to the workload policies of the institution. Hence, the institution’s
workload policies and guidelines were well implemented. Faculty members, though filled with administrative, research as well as extension duties,
were still effective and efficient in their teaching career. These were reflected in the performance evaluation results of the faculty member

user