Page 74 - AREA II-Faculty-BSN-Program Performance Profile

10. Consistent with one of the provisions of the ISU-BOR Resolution No. 37, s. 1998, Chain Promotion will be done by Campus where
the vacancy/ies occur/s. In case there is no qualified faculty in the campus where there is vacancy due to the minimum educational
qualification prescribed in accordance with the QS, an inter-campus transfer of vacant item/s may be allowed. However, such transferred
vacant item will be replaced by an item (e.g., Professor 3 for non-Ph.D. and Assistant Professor I for non-masteral) that can be filled
up by a deserving faculty in the campus where the original vacancy comes from.

The University HRMO will determine which campus will be most qualified to receive the transferred vacant higher item
for as long as that campus has the needed replacement item and has the best qualified faculty who can assume the transferred
vacant item.

11. For upgrading of rank, the criteria and procedures for evaluation provided in the National Budget Circular pertaining to
compensation classification plan for faculty positions in the University shall be followed.

MECHANICS/PROCEDURES

1. The HRMO or a duly authorized representative of the University, upon approval of the President, shall cause the publication and
posting of all vacant positions or ranks to be filled.

The CFSPC shall review the candidates’ credentials or documents submitted to it by the HRMO or its duly authorized representative,
and submit a comprehensive evaluation report of candidates screened for promotion to the President, through the UFSPB,
informing the candidates of the results of the evaluation through the HRMO.

2. The HRMO shall post announcements of evaluation of documents for promotion in conspicuous places in all the Colleges in the
Campus where there are vacancies within a reasonable period before the start of the evaluation. All qualified faculty members are
encouraged to submit documents for evaluation. A deadline for submission of documents will be set.

3. The Campus Evaluation Committee composed of three members are knowledgeable about the application of the provisions of the
NBC 461. The Chairperson, who sits in the deliberation of the CFSPC, is preferably one who has attended the PASUC
Seminar/Training on NBC 461. It will determine the CCE points based on NBC 461 then forward it to the CFSPC.

4. The CFSPC will convene soonest after the deadline to start evaluating documents. The Campus HRMO will forward copies of the
QCE and PES of the faculty candidates for promotion to the Campus Evaluation Committee.

5. The results of the CEC shall be forwarded to the NBC 461 Committee and PASUC Zonal Center for final evaluation and encoding.
The Zonal Center will submit the print out to the CFSPC.

6. Before the CFSPC will transfer the results of the evaluation of documents to the proper form (FPE Form 1) and the ranking prepared,
faculty members may be allowed to clarify their points. No additional document, will, however, be accepted after the deadline. (Note: FPE
means Faculty Promotion Evaluation).

7. The QCE and PES quantitative ratings of the faculty candidates will be summarized in the prescribed form (FPE Form 2) by the CFSPC.
The performance points will then be added to the CCE points to get the total points. From the total points, ranking per faculty rank and
sub-rank will be prepared and summarized in the proper form (FPE Form 3). The result of evaluation and ranking will be forwarded to the
Campus Faculty Selection and Promotions Committee (CFSPC).

8. The CFSPC will review and deliberate on the results of evaluation and ranking and determine those who will be promoted. The
list of faculty to be promoted will be summarized in the proper form (FPE Form 4)

.
user