Page 17 - Area_VI_PPP_Updated

PROGRAM PERFORMANCE PROFILE

service area of the CvSU main campus, the RD and E Coordinators either go in group
or individually.

6. Accomplishment Reports – The Extension Services regularly submits monthly,
weekly and daily accomplishment reports to the concerned offices. At the end of the
year, a Performance Accomplishment Report (PAR) is submitted to the Office of the

President through the RECETS office. This PAR compares the year accomplishments
vis-à-vis targeted activities.

7. Telephone calls – The presence of modern technologies like the cell phones make it
easy to contact and collect information and updates from RD and E Coordinators,
faculty extentionists and clients.

8. Memorandum and Other Written Communication – The Conventional methods of
monitoring projects are through memoranda and other written communication, e.g.

letters.
a. Monitoring Reports and Other Forms
To effectively monitor planned and on-going extension projects and resources of

Extension Services, the following forms shall be used:
❖ Daily Performance Report
❖ Activities/Projects Progress Report (Weekly/Monthly)

❖ Monthly Expenditure and Income of Projects/Services
❖ Student Loan Fund
❖ Loan and Payment Status (Semestral)

❖ Form to Monitor Number of Visitors Served and Accommodated
Section 2. Evaluation Strategies

a) Mechanisms and Processes
The University has established mechanisms and processes by which regular
monitoring and evaluation of extension services and resources are ensured. As

mentioned earlier, these include designation of RDE Council and RDE Coordinators;
and the conduct of yearly in-house review.
The Extension Services has just introduced the logical framework approach

(LFA) or concept in the evaluation of extension programs and projects. It has adopted
the use of Logical Framework Model (Appendix 2) in the presentation of papers during
the In-House Review. This model is able to represent the different types of evaluation.

b) Types of Evaluation
There are different kinds of approaches to evaluation, based on when it occurs

(process vs. outcome), the intentions of the evaluator (formative vs. summative), and
who does the evaluation (internal vs. external).

Area VI: Extension and Community Involvement