Page 289 - V4
P. 289

Sefer Chafetz Chayim                                                                    םייח ץפח רפס
                                   Hilchot Esurei Rechilut                                                              תוליכר ירוסיא תוכלה
                                    Kelal Tet  -  Halachah 1                                                               ה הכלה -  ט ללכ


                the Lav of “Do not stand by passively” includes monetary matters, most                     ףאד ,ע"צ הזב קפוסמ םאד .'וכו עדוי אוה םא )זט(
                certainly included in this Lav is an obligation not to passively stand by
                and leave his fellow Jew to eventually sustain a monetary loss just as it                  יפל םוקמ לכמ ,ןניקזחמ אל יעישרב ישניא יקוזחאד
                does obligate him not to sit by passively when someone’s life is in danger.                השעיש דואמ יוצמ ה"ועב וניניעב ןיאור ונאש המ
                The Torah’s intent in instructing us in this Lav is not to abandon or leave
                a fellow Jew alone to allow him to suffer a life-threatening loss, just as                 ש"מו .וילע ול הלגמ אוהש שיאהל ןיד יפ לע אלש
                the Baraitah illustrates in its example of someone drowning in a river,                    לכ יכ ,ןכ תושעל רבדה ןוכנו רתומ םינפב כ"חא
                that the Torah obligates one to save him \ her; for in the Torah there is no
                mention at all of “testimony” in that Lav.  (The issue was not ‘witnessing’                הזב םג םיכייש ליעל םיכיישש תורבסהו תויארה
                or ‘witness testimony,’ the issue was- Not standing by passively while                     שיאהש קר ז"יע קזיה םוש ודגנכשהל עיגי אלש ןויכ
                someone’s life was in danger of drowning).  And that which the Baraitah
                illustrated “withholding testimony” (which could imply that the Lav is                           .ומצע תא רומשי אוה ול רפסמ אוהש
                only regarding ‘testimony’) comes to teach us that the Lav of “Do not
                stand by passively” applies in monetary matters even if this person already                הוצמ )ב"ע ו"פ אמוי( ורמא אלש .השעמ השעיו )זי(
                gave his money to unscrupulous men who are now disputing his claim to
                return his money and that this witness must testify in court and help the                  הלחתכל  ריהזהל  ןינעל  אלא  םיפנחה  תא  םסרפל
                plaintiff recover his money.  And if this witness is lax and does not give                 ,דספה ידיל אובי אלש ידכ ומע רבחתהל אובי אלש
                testimony, he now violates this Lav of “Do not stand by passively.”  And
                all the more so in our case, that Shimon, who is seeking to hire Plony yet                 עבט תא עדוי אוהו ,ומע רבחתנ רבכ םא וליפא וא
                does not know his character (his lack of honesty) and routinely assumes                    ןינעל  ורובידל  שוחי  קרש  ול  רפסמ  אוהש  שיאה
                he is trustworthy.  Yet Reuven does know Plony as being a thief and even
                though Reuven is a “solitary witness” it is obviously a mitzvah to go and                  קזיה ודי לע ול בבוסיש אל לבא ,ומצע תא רומשל
                report what he knows to Shimon in order that Shimon not lose his wealth                    וילע דיעמ היה םא וליפא ול אב היה אלש המ שממ
                (at the hands of Plony).                                              VOL-4                                  .דבל ד"בב
                (Even though in this context of “withholding testimony” the Lav of “Do
                not stand by passively” is valid only if two witnesses are present (who                    )א"ע ב"י ףד( תותירכב ןניסרגד הממ הז לע היארו
                withheld testimony), because if that was not so there would be no proof
                that his testimony would help him (the “victim”), as the gemara implies                    ,יתאמטנ אל רמוא אוהו תאמטנ םינש ול ורמא םאד
                in  Masechet  Babba  Kamma  (56a)  that  a  single  witness  who  withholds                רתוי ומצע לע ןמאנ םדאד הדוהי 'ר םש רמאקו
                his testimony is liable (only) at the hands of Heaven.  And if you were
                to suggest that the Lav of “Do not stand by passively” is applicable in                    םש( ןניסרגו ,הילע םש יגילפ םימכחו םידע האממ
                all circumstances even if there is only one witness, because through his                   רמא ,הדוהי 'רכ הכלה ןמחנ בר רמא ארמגב )ב"ע
                testimony the victim might have been able to recover his money if the
                other  defendant  declined  to  take  an  oath,  then  the  gemara’s  question             ,ומצעלו ומצע ןיבל וניב אלא הרמא אל ףסוי בר
                would  remain,  (namely)  “It  is  a  Torah  imperative!”      (Please  see  that          אוהש הדוהי 'ר רמא אל שריפש י"שרב םש ןייעו
                reference).  There, the only support the defendant could receive was from
                the testimony of two witnesses who (are the only ones that could) recover                  ומצע  ןיבל  וניב  תורהט  לוכאל  אלא  רוהטו  ןמאנ
                his (the plaintiff’s) money now being held by the man he is contending                     ילוזלזל  יתא  אמליד  לכאי  אל  םירחא  ינפל  לבא
                against in this court case.  But here in our discussion, where the subject is
                “preventing a loss” before it started taking place, and Reuven in conveying                עגונ אוהש תורהט לוכאל ןמאנ ,ומצעל .תורהטב
                                                                                    10


        279                                                                                                                                                          310
      volume 4                                                                                                                                                    volume 4
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294