Page 46 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 46

Researching an answer  45
             hand, you do design a pattern of secondary sources as an
             illuminating context in which to appreciate the primary text,
             your choice and presentation of supporting material will
             obviously reveal your principles. So do use some of your
             reading time for essays in literary theory. Curiosity about
             what you are trying to achieve in writing criticism must
             increase your chances of success. Moreover, even those
             students who feel intimidated by the prospect of studying
             literary theory usually find in practice that discovering a
             wider range of approaches can be fun.


             Literary history and biography


             A firm line is often drawn between scholarship as facts and
             criticism as opinions. The information offered by a competent
             literary historian or biographer is supposedly true even if of
             debatable relevance. By contrast, criticism, the argument runs,
             admits to making only partial and partisan contributions to a
             continuing debate; so you should read it critically, feeling
             sceptical and even downright suspicious about what it wishes
             you to believe.
               Yet even a textual editor, whom you at first take to be
             fastidiously neutral and motivated solely by a wish to give you
             the exact words of the text as its author intended, has to make
             choices. The most elaborate variorum edition may still demote
             some versions to a lowly and ghostly existence at the foot of the
             page while privileging others above in a larger print as if these
             form the only true text. Certainly some commentators would
             now argue that literary history, like all history, is inevitably
             partisan. Its author may never explicitly define—let alone
             rationally defend—any theoretical premises. Yet limited space
             will force selectivity. Many authors and texts will not be openly
             attacked but just silently condemned as not even deserving to be
             mentioned. The few that are judged admissible will be related
             to each other in a patterned sequence: some systems of
             connection and distinction will be given priority; others will be
             quietly rejected. An implicit hierarchy of values will also emerge
             in the varying amounts of space awarded to different texts.
             More specifically, what aspects of any one text are
             foregrounded and which ways of reading it are recommended
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51