Page 47 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 47

46  How to write critical essays
             will depend on the expert’s own convictions as to what a
             culture should create or conserve.
               The converse process by which certain emphases and
             interpretations are censored is potentially even more costly. Of
             course, a politically radical interpretation of  Paradise Lost or
             The Prelude need not be explicitly forbidden as wickedly
             subversive. The scholar’s approach can just bypass it as
             ignorantly tangential: a cul-de-sac fit only for the ill-informed
             or the simple-minded. The English Civil War may be briefly
             acknowledged as contemporary with Milton’s epic. The French
             Revolution may be mentioned as close in time to Wordsworth’s
             verse autobiography. Yet, in a guide to the origins of Paradise
             Lost, Virgil and Dante might still be given overwhelmingly
             more space than contemporary politics. An account of how The
             Prelude discovered its substance and style may devote far more
             pages to Wordsworth’s study of earlier poets (particularly
             Milton himself, as it happens) than to his experience of
             revolution in Paris or his later fears that England itself might
             become unrecognizably democratic.
               Literary history can in fact reduce itself to a mere history of
             literature, as if the history of classes and nations had developed
             in some wholly separate world. The influence of author upon
             author may leave little room for the effect of major events upon
             texts. It may leave none at all for the production or prevention
             of major events by texts themselves.
               You may think that texts simply do not have that kind of
             power; you may think that they mirror, rather than create, the
             beliefs which determine behaviour. Certainly, to seem
             comprehensible to their contemporary readers, texts do have to
             work within a given vocabulary. The parameters of that
             vocabulary do perhaps reflect the prevailing political climate. A
             text’s language must acknowledge those distinctions between
             the meaningfully important and the meaninglessly trivial which
             are accepted by the dominant culture. Nevertheless, within
             these limits, an energetic work of literature may still make itself
             sufficient room for manoeuvre to redefine its readers’
             assumptions about what is conceivable or desirable. ‘Poets’, as
             Shelley argues in his preface to Prometheus Unbound, ‘are in
             one sense the creations and in another the creators of their age’.
               So, too, are scholars and critics. Their preferences among
             texts can be both cause and effect of what modern society
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52