Page 48 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 48

Researching an answer  47
             values in its past history. Shelley himself, for instance, wrote a
             poem called ‘England in 1819’ about a major political event of
             that year. Unarmed and peaceful demonstrators in Manchester
             had been listening to speeches in favour of ordinary people
             being allowed the vote. Cavalry with drawn sabres were sent in
             to disperse them. Many men and women were injured. Some
             were killed. Shelley in that year wrote more than one poem
             which might have made the massacre an unforgettable
             martyrdom to be remembered by any reader who values
             freedom. The poems, like those whom they seek to
             commemorate, are in fact now largely forgotten. Yet as an
             attentive student of literary history, you may still learn to
             remember 1819 as a crucial year because it was then that Keats
             wrote odes to a nightingale and to a piece of ancient Greek
             pottery.
               Literary biography can be as tendentious as literary history.
             Sentimental concentration upon Milton’s physiological
             blindness or gossip about his personal difficulties in relating to
             women are obviously distractions from the poetic texts. But
             even the most sophisticated literary biographies encourage
             certain responses to the text and discourage others. By
             definition of genre, such biography implies that a text’s author
             is a major issue; that discovering what a writer intended in
             composing a text is possible and indeed profitable; that the
             author’s own interpretation and even evaluation may
             legitimately determine ours.
               Moreover, personalizing a text as the product of some
             interestingly individualistic intellect often leads to its content
             being structured around other supposed individuals. A novel’s
             characterization may be assumed to matter more than its
             support for, or challenge to, the values of a given society. If a
             playwright’s own idiosyncrasies of behaviour are emphasized,
             then the voices of the dramatic text are likely to be explored as
             interestingly deviant from, rather than typical of, a particular
             social group or economic class.
               The alliance of literary historians and biographers can be
             exemplified by the reported superiority of Elizabethan to
             medieval drama. Dr Faustus is often described as an advance on
             Everyman less because it offers a subtler analysis of its society
             than because it explores the idiosyncratic thoughts and feelings
             of its individualistic characters. You are likely to be reminded—
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53