Page 82 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 82

Making a detailed case  81
               How far you are justified in abbreviating a quotation depends
             on the point which it must clarify. If you had been asked to
             ‘Discuss In Memoriam’s stanzaic form’, you would be unwise to
             offer many quotations which, like (b) above, begin in the middle
             of a line. Only whole stanzas could support most of your points.
               By contrast, a brief phrase, or even an individual word, can
             usefully be quoted in some contexts:
               In The Heart of Darkness, Conrad’s choice of terminology
               often suggests that the agents of imperialism are not
               awesomely, but absurdly, sinister. The Manager is called a
               ‘devil’ but only a ‘flabby devil’; the brick-maker is a ‘papier-
               maché Mephistopheles’. Their ‘backbiting and intriguing’ is
               described simply as ‘foolish’.

             Here, to quote whole sentences would be ponderous and of
             little assistance to the reader in discovering what the essay
             means to suggest or why the writer believes it to be true.
               Nevertheless, there are limits to how short a quotation can
             be made without becoming enfeebled. Here examples follow
             each other too rapidly to convince:
               In Volpone, Jonson ensures that the language of the theatre is
               constantly used by all the characters: ‘plot’, ‘posture’,
               ‘epilogue’, ‘scene’, ‘mask’ and ‘action’ are examples to be
               readily found.
             This list would hardly persuade someone whose own memory
             suggested that the text did not in fact make ‘constant’ use of
             such terminology. The assertion that ‘all the characters’ employ
             it is dangerously extreme since ‘all’ is nearly always a strictly
             inaccurate word. Here, certainly, one suspects exaggeration.
             The most minor characters say so little that they are unlikely
             ‘all’ to include ‘the language of the theatre’ among their
             relatively few words. Moreover, the reader needs to be shown
             the context in which a term like ‘plot’ is used before being able
             to form a judgement as to whether this is ‘the language of the
             theatre’ or merely a reference to some conspiracy.
               Since quotations should be positioned where they have a
             precise role to play in advancing your argument, the length of
             those that you do use must be appropriate. You need to give
             your reader as many words from the text as are strictly relevant
             to your present point: no more and no less.
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87