Page 18 - WIS
P. 18
3.3.6 Wildlife Impact Study Report Management Plan if required, which then be
Preparation submitted to DOE for EIA Report submission
and approval. To ensure a quality Wildlife
The Wildlife Impact Study team leader Impact Study Report before submission for
will coordinate the writing of the Wildlife approval, consultants can refer Report Quality
Impact Study Report and review it thoroughly Control Assessment (see 3.3.7).
to ensure it encompasses all the elements in
the TOR and is comprehensive, coherent, 3.3.9 Compliance Monitoring
balanced, impartial and technically
acceptable for submission to the authorities. If the proposed project is approved for
The Wildlife Impact Study consultant acting implementation, the project will proceed to
as the team leader shall extract and the subsequent phases of design,
summarise the major findings of the reports construction, and operation. Compliance
and place them in the appropriate chapters in monitoring activities will be conducted by
the Wildlife Impact Study Report. PERHILITAN, to ensure compliance with the
requirements set out in this Guidance
3.3.7 Wildlife Impact Study Report Document will fulfil the Project Proponent’s
Review obligation to Wildlife Conservation Act
(WCA) 2010 (Act 716). Monitoring process is
The Wildlife Impact Study Report must
important to ensure that the Wildlife Impact
be submitted to the Director General of
Study covered all TOR-wildlife component,
PERHILITAN within the stipulated periods for complies with the standard field methods,
approval. The Wildlife Impact Study Report
study design and analysis, wildlife being
Review for projects under the First and immediately released after identification, and
Second Schedule will be conducted at the
removal of traps after Wildlife Impact Study
State PERHILITAN and PERHILITAN
being conducted. This process will also assess
Headquarters, respectively. As general the implementation of mitigation measures
guidance, the Project Proponent and
proposed in Wildlife Impact Study Report by
consultants can refer to the Wildlife Impact Project Proponent. Site inspection will also be
Study Report Quality Self-Assessment Tool
conducted if necessary. This monitoring
for Wildlife Impact Study Report (Appendix).
process will serve the purpose of ensuring the
This is to ensure a quality Wildlife Impact Wildlife Impact Study conditions of approval,
Study Report is prepared before submission
particularly proposed mitigation measures,
for approval by PERHILITAN. are complied with. In this phase, PERHILITAN
will assess the overall project compliance and
3.3.8 Decision Making
opportunity for optimisation and further
improvement in wildlife management of the
A decision is made at the end of the
project, also known as Compliance
review process to approve or reject the
Monitoring.
Wildlife Impact Study Report. Letter of
confirmation will be issued after Review
Meeting, with statement of Wildlife
14 GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON WILDLIFE
IMPACT STUDY FOR IN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
