Page 46 - WIS
P. 46

APPENDIX


                Self-assessment tool for Wildlife Impact Study Report quality control

                     Assessment criteria                                          Score         Expected
                                                                                            assessment result
                  All important tasks (e.g. wildlife study, standard  eld methods, impact   A  The Report can be
                  prediction, proposed mitigation measure, wherever relevant) were        approved.

                  performed
                  All  TOR wildlife-components were covered  Wildlife Impact Study
                  Report complies with the report standard format
                  Data and information are factually correct, can be veri ed, and
                  technically defensible
                  Wildlife Impact Study Report is coherent, legible, and balanced
                  Proposed mitigation measures are considered to be best practices

                  Most important tasks (e.g. wildlife studies, standard  eld methods,   A  The Report can be
                  impact prediction, proposed mitigation measure, wherever relevant)      approved.
                  were performed but some minor ones were not performed
                  All TOR wildlife-components were covered
                  Data are factually correct and technically defensible, but some
                  non-substantive facts cannot be veri ed
                  Wildlife Impact Study Report is coherent and balanced but some
                  non-substantive information may not be presented clearly
                  Wildlife Impact Study Report complies with the report standard format
                  Some non-crucial contents (e.g., scienti c name, protection status) of
                  Wildlife Impact Study Report are not performed or incorrect

                  Important tasks (e.g., wildlife studies, standard  eld methods, impact   F  The Report cannot be
                  prediction, proposed mitigation measure, wherever relevant) were not    approved  and  will be
                  performed                                                               rejected.
                  Some TOR wildlife-components were not covered
                  Wildlife Impact Study Report did not comply with the report standard
                  format
                  Important data and information are factually incorrect and are not
                  technically defensible
                  Important studies were not conducted, or inadequate, or technically
                   awed.
                  Some parts of Wildlife Impact Study Report are biased, incoherent, and
                  unreadable

                  Proposed mitigation measures are not considered to be best practices
                  The score of an A or B or F in column 2 of Table 3.2 is assigned as the
                  overall score of the Wildlife Impact Study Report. To achieve an overall
                  score A or B, all the criteria listed in column 1 of the Table must be

                  complied with. On the other hand, an overall F score will be given to the
                  Report if any of the criteria listed in column 1 is not complied with.


         42  GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON  WILDLIFE
             IMPACT STUDY FOR IN ENVIRONMENTAL
             IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48