Page 276 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 276

20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta
 #
 #
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Yellow 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Cyan 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black
               And now we can return to our topic. If a physician relays incorrect   9         children are obligated to speak disparagingly about their father to
               information about a man’s illness, if the false information does not            rescue him from eternally losing his soul. In addition, patients would
               harm the public (for example, if they could not discharge this public           not agree to go to his clinic if they knew that he sins. It is a sin to steal
               official from his position anyway) then he does not violate the Torah           supplies and accessories from the hospital, and there is no siyata dish-
               prohibition of “Distance yourself from a false matter.” On the other            maya when something is acquired by sin. Therefore, even though the
               hand, it is a great mitzvah to hide the truth from the public eye, thus         physician considers what he does to be permissible, and rationalizes
               preventing the patient from harm. As explained in maseches Nedarim              by saying “Do not muzzle an ox while he is threshing,” the daughter is
               (40a), on the first day that Rava became sick, he asked that no one             obligated to reveal her father’s actions.
               reveal his illness so that his fortune should not go bad. From then                If she knows that when she tells her father that she will inform
               onwards he said: Go out and publicize it in the marketplace so that             the hospital of his actions, he will then stop stealing, but he will hate
               whoever hates me should be happy about it [and thereby I will incur             her and fire her from her job nevertheless, she is obligated to tolerate
               the mercy of Heaven]. As it is says (Mishlei 24:17-18) “When your               this financial loss and not disgrace her father. Even though “the costs
               enemy falls, do not rejoice. And when he stumbles, let your heart not           in honoring one’s father are borne by the father,” nevertheless, it is
               be happy, lest Hashem see and be displeased and turn his wrath from             forbidden to disgrace him, even if the daughter bears a financial loss.
               him [to you].”                                                                     My brother-in-law, Rav Chaim Kanievsky shlit”a, said to me that
                  The Rosh explains Rava’s initial desire to keep his illness secret as        the management of the hospital or health care fund are probably
               follows: Perhaps his enemy will wish him bad and this will make his             aware that moral standards today in the workplace are low (except
               illness worse. In other words, the publicity can be harmful to a sick           among the G-d-fearing), and therefore will forgive the physician for
               man, and especially if his enemies rejoice in his illness. Nowadays, an         what he takes and for the liberties that he allows himself. This is so
               important figure’s illness can easily be publicized to the multitudes.          especially since people flippantly justify their sinful actions with the
               Since public figures generally have enemies, the excessive talk is liable       Biblical verse that an ox may eat from what it threshes – though this
               to cause harm to the patient.                                                   was written about an animal and not a person. But we already find in
                  Therefore it is a great mitzvah to conceal the illness. The public           ancient times that this rationalization was used by uneducated peo-
               figure is in the category of pikuach nefesh since publication is liable         ple. As it says in maseches Chullin (6b) a woman, who is an am ha’aretz
               to cause his condition to worsen. Also, the patient’s concern that he           (boor), who is grinding grain with her friend, will permit herself to
               will lose his position is liable to aggravate his illness. Therefore, it        eat from what she is grinding, justifying it with “Do not muzzle an ox
               seems to me that it is permissible and correct to alter the details and         while he is threshing.” Therefore, he concluded, in our case, since it is
               to minimize the severity of the illness.                                        likely that the hospital will forgive the physician, she should not tell
                  If a physician publicizes the poor health of a public figure in cases        the hospital authorities and not shame her father in public and not
               where this is not permissible, he violates the prohibition of lashon            deprive him of his livelihood. To return a lost object of the public, the
               hara. Even if what he says is true, he is forbidden to reveal it. Lashon        daughter is not obligated to speak badly about her father and thus to
               hara is not only relaying negative information like saying that some-           endanger her own job and livelihood.
               one is not a scholar. Even if the words are not negative or disgraceful            Rabbi Dr. Moshe Rothschild, a man of chessed, asked a similar
               in and of themselves, if they will cause damage, it is forbidden to             question: A son is employed in his father’s grocery store and sees his
               speak them (as explained in Chafetz Chaim, Rule 1, #1).                         father [when selling on account] recording in his book much more




        270              1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein                       Speaking about one’s father  2                                  263
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281