Page 277 - 20818_park-B_efi
P. 277

20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Cyan
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Yellow
 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta
 #
 #20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Yellow 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Magenta 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Cyan 20818_efi-ab - 20818_efi-ab | 9 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:29:02 | SR:-- | Black
                   #
 in “Cursed is he who dishonors his father.” These transgressions are   An incident is described in the Yerushalmi (Peah 1:1). A group of                                      9
 not permitted even for a beneficial purpose, just as one is not allowed   people were obligated to go out to do the King’s Work as soldiers.
 to serve idols or have forbidden relations and commit other trans-  Among them was one man whose name was “Bar-Chovetz,” who did
 gressions for a beneficial purpose.  not show up as required. One of the men said to another: What shall
 It would seem that we can prove that one is permitted to speak   we eat? And he answered: Today we will eat chuvtza (a type of lentil).
 badly even about a father, if it is done for a purpose, and that the   When he said the word chuvtza, the supervising policemen remem-
 daughter is obligated to inform the appropriate authorities at the hos-  bered that “Bar-Chovetz” was absent and sent for him. When Rabbi
 pital (if all the conditions explained by Chafetz Chaim are met). Proof   Yochanan heard this he said: This man is guilty of speaking lashon
 for this is in Sefer Chassidim (#1087), where he writes as follows:   hara in a discreet way.
              From this story we can learn several things:
 If a person sees someone entrusting something to his fa-
 ther or mother or teacher, and he knows that they are not   1.  Although he did not say anything shameful about Bar-Chovetz,
 trustworthy, then if the one entrusting the item is wise and   since his words caused him damage, he violated the prohibition
 decent, he should tell him not to entrust it and he should   of lashon hara.
 reveal the truth to him. But if the one entrusting the item   2.  Although he did not speak of him openly but only gave a slight
 is not wise and it would not be appropriate to tell him, he   hint by saying “chuvtza,” he still violated the prohibition of slan-
 should just say not to give it to them, but he should not say   der by causing a loss to Bar-Chovetz. As the Mishnah Berurah
 anything bad about his father or mother or teacher; and   (156:4) rules, “If one says things that cause bodily or monetary
 only to good people one should tell the truth.  damage to one’s fellowman, or cause him some damage or fear,
                this is called lashon hara.”
 The source for the words of Sefer Chassidim is probably maseches Me-
 gillah (13b) where it speaks of Rachel Immeinu who said to Yaakov:   According to this, publicizing that a public official is sick if the pub-
 “My father is a deceitful man and you cannot withstand him.” But one   licity will cause him harm is considered lashon hara. So, too, if one
 should reflect - in Sefer Chassidim the author says that one should not   publicizes that a specific bank is in a bad state, this is also lashon hara
 tell people that one’s father is wicked, so how could she say her father   since people are likely to withdraw their money as a result.
 is a deceitful man? The answer is that she had to warn Yaakov about   The Chafetz Chaim (Hilchos Rechilus 1:8) teaches: Levi told Shimon
 the intensity of her father’s deception. She had to make him aware   lashon hara about Reuven. Later, Reuven came and asked Shimon:
 that Lavan would not only deceive him once in a while, but that in his   What did Levi tell you about me?  What should Shimon do? Should
 nature he was a professional swindler.  he reveal what he heard or not? The answer is that it depends. If he
 Therefore, in our case, it seems that the daughter is obligated to   can answer without lying or speaking rechilus, he should do so. But if
 reveal her father’s actions to the guard at the hospital, if he is wise and   Reuven will understand from his response that Levi said bad things
 decent. But if he is not wise and decent, she should only hint to him   about him, he is allowed to say an outright lie in order to maintain the
 that he ought to pay attention to her father’s actions.   peace and to avoid the prohibition of rechilus.
 Just think, if a father is ill and in order to heal him one has to   According to this, in our case, if people ask the physician about
 remove his clothes and this will embarrass him, it is clear that a son   the public official’s state of health, then if the physician can evade the
 or daughter are obligated to do so in order to save his life. So, too,   question and answer without any lie or lashon hara, he should so. But,




 262   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Publicizing an inaccurate medical bulletin  2   271
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282