Page 84 - TaxAdviser_Jan_Apr23_Neat
P. 84

his article reviews and analyzes   replaced the unified audit rules as   IRS sent the LLC a notice of proposed
         Trecent law changes as well       well as the electing large partnership   adjustment proposing to disallow a
                                           regime of TEFRA. In 2018, Congress   charitable deduction for a conserva-
         as rulings and decisions involving
                                           enacted the Tax Technical Corrections   tion easement.
         partnerships. The discussion covers
                                           Act (TTCA),3 which made a number    The LLC disagreed with the disal-
         developments in the determination   of technical corrections to the rules   lowance and asked for a review from the
         of partners and partnerships, gain on   under the centralized partnership audit   IRS’s Independent Office of Appeals be-
         disposal of partnership interests, part-  regime. The amendments under the   fore the IRS issued its Final Partnership
         nership audits, and basis adjustments.   TTCA are effective as if included in   Administrative Adjustment (FPAA).
                                           Section 1101 of the BBA and, there-  The LLC attached a signed Form 872-P
           During the period of this update   fore, are subject to the effective dates in   and asked the IRS to execute the form
         (Nov. 1, 2021, through Oct. 31, 2022),   Section 1101(g) of the BBA.  and extend the statutory period so that
         the IRS issued guidance for taxpayers                               the LLC could obtain a review by the
         regarding changes made to Subchapter   Court decisions under TEFRA  Independent Office of Appeals before
         K over the past few years. Also, the Ser-  Even with the adoption of the BBA   issuance of the FPAA. The IRS refused
         vice issued guidance related to foreign   audit rules, cases are still being liti-  to extend the statutory period and did
         partners. In addition, the courts and the   gated involving TEFRA issues. Most   not allow an Independent Office of Ap-
         IRS issued various rulings that addressed  of these TEFRA cases involve either   peals review before it filed the FPAA.
         partnership operations and allocations.   of two issues: the statute of limitation   The LLC sued the IRS, seeking relief to
                                           or whether income or a deduction is   stop the IRS’s process.
         Audit issues                      a partnership item. During the up-  Before the suit was heard, the IRS
         In 1982, the Tax Equity and Fiscal   date period, several cases dealt with a   issued the FPAA. The LLC amended
         Responsibility Act (TEFRA)1 en-   statute-of-limitation issue, two dealt   its complaint, seeking to have everything
         acted “unified audit rules” to simplify   with a partnership item issue, and one   undone so it could go back and have the
         IRS audits of large partnerships by   dealt with penalties assessed during the   review. The court dismissed the case,
         determining partnership tax items   TEFRA audit.                    holding that it did not have subject mat-
         at the partnership level. Any adjust-                               ter jurisdiction because the FPAA had
         ments would then flow through to the   Statute-of-limitation issues  already been issued. The court explained
         partners, against whom the IRS would   During the audit of Rocky Branch   that it could not order the IRS to re-
         assess deficiencies. Two issues that arose  Timberlands LLC’s4 partnership return   scind an FPAA because it would violate
         frequently under TEFRA concerned   for 2017, the IRS determined that it   the Anti-Injunction Act. It is interesting
         partnership-level items of income and   would need an extension of time to   to note that if the LLC had agreed to
         the statute of limitation for the partners   complete the audit beyond the three-  the original request for an extension, it
         and the partnership.              year statute of limitation. As such,   would have been able to have the case
           In an effort to streamline the audit   the IRS asked the LLC to extend the   reviewed by the Independent Office
         process for large partnerships, Congress   statutory period for an additional 15   of Appeals.
         enacted Section 1101 of the Bipartisan   months and sent the LLC a Form   Another case, Baxter, dealt with
         Budget Act of 2015 (BBA),2 which   872-P, Consent to Extend the Time to   an American Agri-Corp (AMCOR)
         amended in its entirety Sec. 6221 et   Assess Tax Attributable to Items of a   partnership structure consisting of three
         seq. The revised sections instituted new   Partnership, to consent to the extension.   partnerships that the IRS determined
         procedures for auditing partnerships,   The LLC signed the consent but did   was an impermissible tax shelter.5 The
         affecting issues including determining   not return it to the IRS. Later, the LLC   IRS issued FPAAs for all three partner-
         and assessing deficiencies, who pays   told the IRS that it had decided not to   ships to the tax matters partner. The IRS
         the assessed deficiency, and how much   extend the statutory period. Before the   had determined that the partnerships
         tax must be paid. The BBA procedures   original statute of limitation lapsed, the   engaged in a series of sham transactions

          1.  Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, P.L. 97-248.  5.  Baxter, No. H-09-1271 (S.D. Tex. 3/17/21), rev’d, No. 21-20258 (5th Cir.
          2.  Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, P.L. 114-74.      8/31/22). AMCOR offered loss-generating structures for investors that the
          3.  Tax Technical Corrections Act, Title II, Division U, of the Consolidated Ap-  IRS began investigating in the 1980s, giving rise to extensive litigation. See,
            propriations Act of 2018, P.L. 115-141.            e.g., Keener, 76 Fed. Cl. 455 (2007), and Foster, No. A-06-CA-818-SS
          4.  Rocky Branch Timberlands, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-2605-MLB (N.D. Ga.   (W.D. Tex. 6/19/18), aff’d, 801 Fed. Appx. 210 (5th Cir. 2020).
            6/21/22).



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                               February 2023  29
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89