Page 89 - TaxAdviser_Jan_Apr23_Neat
P. 89

PARTNERS & PARTNERSHIPS





            A partnership interest is not considered of like kind to real property
                and thus does not qualify for Sec. 1031 exchange treatment.


           The withdrawing partners filed   Character of partner’s loss      Sec. 1221(a)(1) and thus were capital.
         Forms 8082 contesting the income   The character of a loss was at issue in a   The taxpayer alternatively argued that
         allocations. The IRS audited the part-  case24 in 2022 in which a taxpayer and   the lots were inventory as defined in
         nership return and issued an FPAA   his colleague formed a partnership that   Sec. 751(d) and that, pursuant to Sec.
         that disregarded the distributions and   purchased lots for investment purposes.   735(a), they retained their inventory
         redetermined the allocations of ordi-  Before any lots were sold or distrib-  character from the partnership. There-
         nary income, contending that the dis-  uted, the partnership did not make   fore, he argued, he was allowed an
         tributions had not been substantiated   any improvements to develop the lots.   ordinary loss upon their sale within five
         and that the corresponding allocations   Later, some of the lots were distributed   years of the partnership’s distribution.
         of income lacked substantial economic   to the taxpayer, and he sold them at   The court also rejected this argument.
         effect. The partnership petitioned the   a loss. The taxpayer reported the loss
         Tax Court.                        as ordinary.                      Final regulations address
           The Tax Court agreed with the     The character of income reported   foreign stock owned through
         partnership and rejected the IRS’s de-  by a partner is generally determined   domestic partnerships
         termination to disregard the distribu-  at the partnership level. In this situa-  In 2018, Treasury and the IRS issued
         tions. Instead, the court found that the   tion, the IRS determined that the loss   proposed regulations regarding the
         distribution treatment was correct and   on the sale should be capital and not   treatment of domestic partnerships
         that the partnership’s method for valu-  ordinary, as reported. It noted that the   for purposes of determining amounts
         ing the distributions met the definition   lots were purchased by the partner-  included in the gross income of their
         of fair market value (FMV) under   ship for investment purposes, not for   partners with respect to controlled
         Regs. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(h)(1).   development; therefore, any losses at   foreign corporations for purposes of
         However, the court also found that the   the partnership level would have been   Sec. 951A.25 In 2019, these proposed
         partnership’s special income allocations   capital. It also indicated that, even   regulations were finalized in modi-
         to the withdrawing partners lacked   if the lots were initially intended for   fied form26 and additional proposed
         substantial economic effect because the   development, the development plan was   regulations issued (the 2019 proposed
         partnership had not maintained capital   abandoned well before the lots were   regulations)27 that would extend the
         accounts for the partners. Thus, the   distributed and that no improvements   treatment of domestic partnerships as
         distributions did not meet the require-  were in fact made. Other factors that   aggregates of their partners for pur-
         ments under Regs. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)   indicated the loss was capital included   poses of determining income inclusions
         for maintaining capital accounts and   that the sale was an isolated transaction   under Sec. 951 and provisions appli-
         had to be reallocated in accordance   for the taxpayer and that the taxpayer’s   cable by reference to it. Then, in 2020,
         with the partnership interests under   regular business was a law practice, not   Treasury and the IRS finalized the por-
         Sec. 704(b) and Regs. Sec. 1.704-1(b)  real estate. The facts that the taxpayer   tions of the 2019 proposed regulations
         (3). In addition, since the withdrawing   hired a broker and advertised the lots   relating to Secs. 951A and 954 address-
         partners had negative capital accounts   for sale were not enough to counter the   ing the treatment of income subject to
         at the end of the year and the partner-  other facts.               a high rate of foreign tax.28
         ship agreement included a qualified   The Tax Court agreed with the   In 2022, Treasury and the IRS final-
         income offset provision, ordinary in-  IRS and concluded that the lots in   ized an additional portion of the 2019
         come had to be allocated first to those   the taxpayer’s hands were neither his   proposed regulations.29 These final reg-
         partners in the amount necessary to   stock in trade, inventory, nor property   ulations apply to U.S. persons that own
         bring their respective capital accounts   held primarily for sale to customers in   stock of foreign corporations through
         up to zero.                       the ordinary course of business under   domestic partnerships and domestic

         24.  Musselwhite, T.C. Memo. 2022-57.              27.  REG-101828-19.
         25.  REG-104390-18.                                28.  T.D. 9902.
         26.  T.D. 9866.                                    29.  T.D. 9960.




         34  February 2023                                                                    The Tax Adviser
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94