Page 399 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא בלול ילוספו בלולבש םינימ ‘ דב םילוספה ןיד - ט “ מק ללכ ייח

ּ
ּ
ּ
ֹ
ּוהֶז 49 ,ר ָּד ָּה ֹוני ֵא ְּו הֶלָּע ֹותֹוא ל ַּטִנ ּו ּ ל ִא ְּכ יֵוֲהַו ת ֶמי ְּת ַה ה ָּקְּל ְּחֶנ לַל ְּכ ִב הֶז םַּג ,ה ָּר ְּד ִּ ׁש ַה
לָּּכ ק ֶד ֶס ְּב טַע ְּמ ק ַר קַל ְּחֶנ אל ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ַד ר ֵתֹוי ןי ִרי ִמ ְּח ַמ ׁשֵי לָּבֲא .םי ִק ְּסֹו ּפ ַה בר תַע ַד
ֹ
ּ
ֹ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
, ּהָּּ לֻּכ ק ֵדָּּסִל ּהָּפֹוס םי ִעּונ ְּעִנ ַה י ֵדְּי לַע ְּד ,לּוסָּ ּפ י ֵמָּנ ,םיִנֹויְּל ֶע ָּה ןיִלָּע ֶה ן ִמ ד ָּח ֶא אּוה ֶ ׁש
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ןָּיְּנ ִע ְּב ק ַד ְּסִנ ֶ ׁש א ָּק ְּו ַד ְּו .ר ָּ ׁש ְּפ ֶא ם ִא רי ִמ ְּח ַהְּל יּוארו ָּ ְּ 11 .י ֵמ ָּד קּודָּס ְּכ ק ֵדָּּסִל ד ֵמֹוע ָּה לָּכ ְּו
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
א ָּר ְּקִנ ֶ ׁש ּוהֶז ְּו ק ֶד ֶּס ַה ה ֶא ְּרִנ ֶ ׁש ד ַע ק ֶד ֶּס ַה ב ֵח ַר ְּתִנ ם ִא לָּבֲא .ק ַד ְּסִנ ֶ ׁש ה ֶא ְּרִנ ֹוני ֵא ֶ ׁש
ֹ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
הֶלָּע ֶה לֶצ ֵא ֶ ׁש ןיִלָּע ֶה ק ַר הָּנֹויְּל ֶע ָּה ה ָּקְּל ְּחֶנ אל ּו ּ ל ִפא ֲ 1 1 ,ק ַדְּנ ִה ְּכ ק ַד ְּסִנ ֶ ׁש א ָּר ָּמ ְּּגַּב
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
13 :לּוסָּפ ְּד ,ק ַדְּנ ִה ְּכ ה ָּר ְּד ִּ ׁש ַה ה ָּק ְּד ְּסִנ ם ִא ןֵּכ ֶ ׁש לָּכ ְּו .לּוספ ָּ ּ 12 ,טּוע ִמ ְּב ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ,הָּנֹויְּל ֶע ָּה
םדו רשב
זל
lulav ) (most acharonim disagree: The Taz discourage gluing the lulav together (R’
writes that there is no reason to invalidate a Menashe Klein zt”l, R’ Moshe Shternbuch
lulav which has split less than a tefach חל and shlit”a. This was also reportedly the opinion of
the Gra writes that clearly a partial split (i.e. R’ Chaim Kanievsky zt”l.)
less than half way down) is considered closed.
The Mishna Berura, however, advises using a 51. The gemara (Succah 31b-32a) teaches
lulav which is completely closed, in deference that although a crack does not disqualify the
to the more stringent opinions. (See however lulav, if the crack creates a distance between
Aruch Hashulchan and Bikurei Yaakov who are the two sides, like a ‘himnick’, it is posul. Rashi
טל
lenient ). explains that a himnick was a metal tool used
by copyists in which the two sides were
50. Ritva (cited above in the previous distanced from each other. If the crack
note). The Mishna Berura quotes the Chayei resembles that of a himnik, the lulav is posul.
Adam as advisable, and some poskim The Chayei Adam here refers to it as a ‘hindik’
therefore advise gluing the separated leaves but the intention is one and the same.
so that they don’t separate more. (R’ S. Z.
Auerbach, R’ Y. S. Elyashiv, R’ N. Karelitz, 52. Magen Avraham.
מ
among others) It should be noted that this
only applies to a lulav whose leaves are 53. Even where there is no issue of a split
separately slightly and is otherwise kosher, teyomes, one must be extremely vigilant to
and glue is only introduced to prevent it from ensure that the crack didn’t separate like a
splitting more. Others have reservations and ‘himnik’. (Pri Megadim, Mishna Berura).

399