Page 7 - KZN Business Sense - Hantie Plomp
P. 7

COMPETITION FILING NOTIFICATION FOR


        HOSTILE TRANSACTIONS





                    Michael Jackson, Senior   In the recent judgement of   Guidelines) that it would follow in     required to provide information    parties and share all issued
                    Partner, Cox Yeats   the Competition Tribunal (the   the determination as to whether     to the Commission if the    directions with them. This is so as
                     Attorneys        Tribunal) of Caxton and CTP   or not it would permit a separate     investigation commences;  to enable the filing to be brought
                                      Publishers & Printers Limited vs   merger notification and its   4.  The implications for third    to completion.
                         he           The Competition Commission    approach to timelines applicable     parties who may be required    Where there is non-compliance
                         Competition   of South Africa and Mpact    to the merger filing process.    to provide information to the    with the Commission’s stated
                    TAct (the         Limited, the Tribunal stated that   These Guidelines, issued under     Commission if the    timelines for filing of the merger
                      Act) provides   the Commission should provide   Section 79 of the Act, indicate     investigation commences  notification documents, the
                       that mergers   guidance to parties on what   the policy approach which the   5.  The implications for the    Commission is to issue a notice of
                       above a defined   types of transactions it would   Commission will follow.    Commission and its         incomplete filing. Where a primary
                       threshold      consider appropriate for a Rule 28                               resources if the investigation    firm fails to submit its filing in
                       must be        application.                   The first issue which the      commences;                  the period specified, the other
                       notified to the   The Chairman of Caxton     Commission is required to     6.  Whether merger control    primary firm can only advance the
        Competition Commission (the   had met with the Chairman of   determine is whether a merger     will be effective, for instance,    filing process by making further
        Commission) and may not be    Mpact and had discussed the   is in existence or whether, like     if undertakings are to be    application to the Commission
                                                                    the Caxton case, it is simply
        implemented until a merger    desire of Caxton to increase its   proposed. There needs to be a     sought from the acquiring    allowing it to file on behalf of the
        approval has been granted. Most   shareholding in Mpact. Caxton   firm or indicative offer on the     firm in respect of competition    recalcitrant filing firm.
        merger notifications are made   asked Mpact to co-operate with   part of the acquiring firm and     or public interest issues    Finally, the Commission states
        in a single filing which contains   it in the submission of a joint   the offer must contain the price     and the acquiring firm is not    in its Guidelines that they are not
        information about the acquiring   filing to the Commission for   and terms and conditions of the     a willing party to the filing;  exhaustive and will not effect the
        and target firm. This assumes that   merger approval.       proposed merger including an   7.  Any other factors that may    discretion of the Commission and/
        the acquiring and target firm are   Mpact expressed its opposition   indication of the proposed date of     be deemed relevant by the    or Tribunal and Courts to consider
        co-operating with each other and   to this proposal because no   implementation.            Commission.                 separate merger notification issues
        support the merger process.   firm offer had been made to its   Once the Commission is     The Commission must then     on a case by case basis, taking into
          Rule 28 to the Rules of the   shareholders containing price,   satisfied that there exists a   provide reasons for its decision   account the criteria or information
        Commission provides for the   terms and conditions and it was   merger or a proposed merger,   whether to permit a separate filing   placed before the Commission at
        Commission to allow, in certain  unclear whether Caxton had the   the Commission proceeds to the   or not.              the time the decision is made.
                                      necessary finances in place.
          circumstances, separate merger                            second enquiry which is whether   The second issue on which the   Although the Guidelines provide
        notification. The purpose of the   Although Caxton supplied   it is reasonable and just to allow   Commission provided guidance is   some clarification to the process
        Rule is to provide for situations   certain information to the   a separate filing. The Guideline   the timelines applicable to separate   followed in a hostile merger, the
        where there is a hostile take-over   Commission, it was of the view   states that the Commission   merger notifications.  process is still very cumbersome
                                                                                                                                and can be abused by a target firm
                                      that the Commission did not need
                                                                    exercises its discretion and what
        and the acquiring firm is not co-                                                          The period within which the
        operating with the target firm.  to know the exact nature of the   constitutes a reasonable decision                    which is not prepared to cooperate
                                      transaction before determining   will depend on the circumstances   Commission determines whether   with the acquiring firm.
          Rule 28 is subject to abuse. An   whether a separate filing was to   of each case. This will involve   or not to permit a separate merger   The Rules of the Commission
        application has to be made to the   be permitted. It stated that the   a weighing in exercise and the   notification is not determined by   should be amplified to deal
        Commission to allow separate   acquisition would occur through   factors which the Commission   the Regulations. The Commission   expressly with this issue. 
        filings and the Commission    either a mandatory offer under   will take into account include:  must communicate its decision to
        may grant the application if   Section 123 of the Companies   1.  Any prejudice to the target    the parties and during this period,
        it is reasonable and just to do   Act or through a general offer by     firm that may be occasioned    the Commission must engage the   Should you require advice or assistance,
                                                                                                                                please contact Michael Jackson on
        so. Once the Commission has   Caxton to Mpact shareholders,     by separate filing;       primary firms in order to satisfy   T: +27 (0)31 536 8512
        allowed a separate filing in terms   under Section 121 of the   2.  The ability of each primary    itself of the requirements of the   E: mjackson@coxyeats.co.za
        of Rule 28, then there is further   Companies Act.            firm to submit a meaningful    two-stage enquiry.         W: www.coxyeats.co.za
        uncertainty as to the timelines to   Following the judgement, the     separate filing;     Once the Commission allows a
        be followed and the target firm   Commission issued, on 5 January   3.  The implications for the    separate filing, the Commission
        can abuse the process.        2024, draft guidelines (the     primary firms who may be    must issue directives to both



        UNVEILING OF NEW BUSINESS LOUNGE



             he Durban International   offering an exclusive environment   contemporary furnishings,   The launch event marked the   to 21:00, welcoming guests
             Convention Centre (Durban   for relaxation, private meetings,   and state-of-the-art facilities,   beginning of an exciting new   to indulge in a world-class
        TICC) proudly announces       and networking.               all tailored to meet the needs   chapter for the Durban ICC,   experience in the heart of the
        the grand opening of its newest   With its high-end amenities and   of modern business travellers   as it continues to innovate and   city.
        venture, the Durban ICC Business   personalised service, the lounge   and executives. Guests had   elevate the hospitality experience
        Lounge. This upscale space,   provides a sanctuary for discerning   the opportunity to experience   in Durban. The Durban ICC   For more information call
        designed to cater to the needs of   guests seeking a premium   first-hand the luxury and   Business Lounge is now open   Tel: +27 31 360 1000 or
        business executives and leisure   experience in the bustling Central   convenience of the lounge, which   Monday to Saturday from 12:00   visit www.icc.co.za
        travellers alike, is the latest offering   Business District of Durban.  boasts private meeting spaces,
        from the iconic centre always                               high-speed internet access, and
        striving to meet the needs of its   “We are thrilled to introduce the   a curated selection of culinary
        clientele.                    Durban ICC Business Lounge,   offerings.
                                      which represents our commitment
          The launch event, held on 8 April,   to enhancing the hospitality   In addition to providing a
        was attended by esteemed guests,   offerings in Durban,” said Lindiwe   premium space for business
        including the full board of directors   Rakharebe, Durban ICC chief   activities, the Durban ICC
        of the Durban ICC, along with   executive officer. “This new venture   is committed to supporting
        eThekwini Mayor Mxolisi Kaunda   reflects our dedication to providing   local suppliers and promoting
        and city manager, Musa Mbhele,   exceptional experiences for our   sustainability. The lounge’s
        underscoring the significance of   guests while contributing to the   culinary offerings feature a menu
        this milestone for the city.  economic growth and revitalisation   crafted from sustainably sourced
                                                                    ingredients, with an emphasis
          The Durban ICC Business     of the city.”                 on showcasing the rich culinary
        Lounge sets a new standard for   The launch event showcased   heritage of Durban and its
        sophistication and comfort,   the lounge’s elegant design,   surrounding region.          Speaking at the ribbon cutting ceremony, eThekwini Mayor Mxolisi Kaunda
                                                                                                  congratulated the Durban ICC for the sterling work it is doing.



                                                                                                                                                           7
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12