Page 181 - Veterinary Toxicology, Basic and Clinical Principles, 3rd Edition
P. 181

148 SECTION | I General




  VetBooks.ir  TABLE 9.2 Proposed Administration Routes of Test  desirable in order to reveal reproductive toxicological
                                                                data (OECD, 2001a; Barlow et al., 2002; Garg et al.,
               Compounds in Laboratory Animals Based on the
                                                                2011; Estevan et al., 2011), although this approach
               Medium of Exposure                               requires large numbers of animals and is time consuming.
               Medium of Human and Domestic/   Administration
               Farm Animal Exposure to Toxicant  Route
                                                                Developmental Toxicity Testing
               Food commodities                Oral
                                                                Developmental toxicity testing is primarily used to deter-
               Water                           Oral
                                                                mine hazard regarding the potential effects of prenatal
                                               Inhalation       exposure on the developing fetus. These studies focus on
                                               Dermal           functional and structural changes that can be observed
                                                                throughout the development from zygote to neonate. The
               Air                             Inhalation
                                                                most important developmental phase is the organogenesis
               Household/environmental surfaces  Oral           period that is always taken into account in developmental
                                               Dermal           toxicity testing. Based on these studies, chemical com-
                                                                pounds can be categorized as teratogenic and/or fetotoxic
                                                                by recording structural malformations, developmental
                                                                retardation and/or mortality, respectively. The vast major-
                                                                ity of teratogenic chemical agents have been identified
               TABLE 9.3 Selective Endpoints Applied to Laboratory  using rodent experimental models (EPA, 1998b, 2000;
               Animals During Reproductive Toxicity Testing     OECD, 2001b, 2016a,b). However, the failure of rodents
                                                                to detect teratogenic signal on some occasions and the
               Female                 Male
                                                                similarities in placentation and pregnancy physiology
               Reproductive tract     Sperm structure/morphology  between humans and rabbits led to the use of the rabbit as
               morphology
                                                                a second model for assessing the effects of toxic com-
               Reproductive tract receptors  Sperm motility/viability/count  pounds on development (EPA, 1998b; Foote and Carney,
               Ovum properties        Sperm DNA integrity       2000; OECD, 2001b). Furthermore, although nonhuman
                                                                primates have been suggested as models for teratological
               Recovery of blastocysts  Hormonal balance/receptor
                                      interactions              testing (Buse et al., 2003; Faqi, 2011), they have several
                                                                limitations such as a long gestation period, only single
               Hormonal balance/receptor  Fertility testing interactions
                                                                or twin offspring, high rates of abortion and ethical
               Length and normality of                          constraints.
               estrus cycle
                                                                  The detection rates for veterinary pharmaceutical
               Fertility testing                                agents demonstrated to be teratogenic/fetotoxic were
                                                                found to be 55% 79% using individual species (Hurtt
               Uterine condition
                                                                et al., 2003). However, when the rat and rabbit data were
               Implantation
                                                                both considered, there was a significant increase in detec-
               Lactation                                        tion rate to almost 100%, suggesting that in the absence
               Maternal behavior                                of teratogenicity in rat, a second species developmental
                                                                test in lagomorpha is required to provide high standards
                                                                of public protection (Hurtt et al., 2003). The interested
                                                                reader can retrieve some more information on reproduc-
                                                                tive and developmental toxicity testing by referring to a
             Some of the disadvantages of using rabbits are the higher
                                                                specialized textbook (Gupta, in press).
             cost due to greater amounts of chemical compounds
             administered and the increased cases of abortions because
             of the relatively high incidence of gastrointestinal dys-  Cutaneous Toxicity Testing
             function. For example, rabbits are poor models for veteri-
             nary residue testing and, more specifically, for antibiotics  The aim of in vivo assays for cutaneous toxicity is not
             because these compounds have been found to cause diar-  only to assess potential acute local irritation but also to
             rhea and consequently abortion (Barlow et al., 2002).  evaluate acute, subchronic and chronic systemic toxic
                Since exposure to chemicals can occur throughout life,  effects. During cutaneous toxicity tests, animals are moni-
             a multigeneration study that extends over at least two gen-  tored for skin reactions/dermal effects, clinical, gross or
             erations, using a single type of laboratory rodent, is  microscopic pathological findings depending on the
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186