Page 252 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 252

14


  VetBooks.ir


           Cancer Immunotherapy




           STEVEN DOW AND AMANDA GUTH






           The main role of the immune system is recognition of “foreign”   chapter will first discuss the role of the immune system in regu-
           proteins. In the case of cancer, this role includes immune rec-  lating tumor development, then the various classes of immuno-
           ognition of mutated or altered forms of self-proteins that arise   therapies both currently in use and those under investigation. The
           during tumorigenesis (commonly referred to as “tumor antigens”   biological basis for the therapies, their use in human and compan-
           [TAs]). However, it is now apparent that powerful regulatory cells   ion animals, and their successes and limitations will be discussed.
           and expression of certain molecules whose main functions are to
           prevent rampant, uncontrolled immune responses can also serve
           to block natural development of effective antitumor immune   Immune System Control of Tumor
           response. Therefore immunotherapy approaches in treatment of
           various cancers must take into account the ability to overcome   Development and Growth
           these negative regulators of tumor immunity to be successful.  Immune Surveillance of Cancer
             Under appropriate conditions, the immune system is capable
           of controlling cancer. For example, it is well established that the   Forty years ago, Thomas and Burnet, while studying how lym-
           incidence of virally induced cancers is increased in immunosup-  phocytes could respond to newly formed antigens on trans-
           pressed  individuals.  Further,  cancer  incidence  increases  in  aged   formed cells, put forth the concept that the immune system could
           individuals and correlates with the progression of immunese-  actively respond to and eliminate neoplastic cells, an idea known
                                                                                    6
           nescence (aging and exhaustion of the immune response) that is   as immune surveillance.  In contrast, later studies showed that
           thought to reduce immunosurveillance of cancer, a topic discussed   genetically manipulated immunodeficient (athymic) mice did not
           in the text that follows. Moreover, in some cases, spontaneous   demonstrate an increased incidence of spontaneously or carcinogen-
           remission of tumors is observed without any therapeutic interven-  induced cancer.  Such observations led to the immune surveil-
                                                                             7,8
           tion, most likely attributed to a successful immune response. Bio-  lance concept falling out of favor.
           logically, tumor-specific T cells are observed in the tumor tissue   Since the development of more sensitive and sophisticated
           and tumor-draining lymph nodes, providing evidence that these   technologies, many of the ideas behind the concept of the immune
           cells have encountered and recognized the tumor cells as foreign.   surveillance hypothesis are now again accepted, and currently, this
           Finally,  in some cases,  paraneoplastic  autoimmunity  develops,   modification of the original hypothesis is referred to as the immu-
                                                                                 9
           suggesting that the antitumor  immune  response has somehow   noediting hypothesis,  which consists of three phases: (1) “elimina-
           gone unchecked by regulatory cells.                   tion”—removal of the immunogenic tumor cells by the immune
             Recently the field of immunotherapy took an exciting twist   system; however, less immunogenic cells can survive; (2) “equilib-
           with the development in human medicine of therapeutic anti-  rium”—tumor growth and immune destruction are equal; and (3)
           bodies designed to target immune suppressive molecules (check-  “escape”—tumor growth ensues due to decreased immunogenic-
                                                                                                           9
           point  molecules)  and/or  their  ligands  expressed  on T  cells  and   ity, immune suppression, and rapid tumor cell growth.  However,
           antigen-presenting cells, such as programmed death molecule-1   despite recent data, a controversy still remains around the immune
                                                                                                                 9
           (PD-1) and cytotoxic  T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). By   surveillance hypothesis, discussed in a review by Schreiber et al.  
           using antibodies to block negative signaling by certain checkpoint
           molecules such as PD-1 and CTLA-4, remarkable, and durable,   Mechanisms of Immune Evasion by Tumors
           antitumor responses have been observed in a significant, but
           minority, subset of patients with advanced tumors such as mela-  Given the fact that cancer can develop in immunocompetent indi-
           noma, renal cell carcinoma, and non–small cell lung cancer. 1–5    viduals, clearly tumor cells are able to avoid recognition by the
           The development of checkpoint targeted immunotherapies has   immune system.  This is accomplished by various mechanisms
                                                                              10
           reignited the field of immunotherapy for cancer, and similar anti-  discussed in the text that follows, which involve both changes in
           bodies for treatment of cancer in dogs are under development by   the tumor cells themselves and ways in which the tumor and the
           several different groups, including ours.             tumor stromal environment can manipulate the immune system
             Improving knowledge of the immune system and how it is reg-  and prevent antitumor immunity. These mechanisms of immune
           ulated will increase our ability to design better immunotherapies.   evasion pose a significant challenge to the development of effec-
           In addition, immunotherapy has the potential to work in con-  tive immunotherapies. Fig. 14.1 demonstrates some of these key
           junction with chemotherapies, radiation therapy, and surgery. This   mechanisms.


                                                                                                                231
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257