Page 488 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 488

466   PART IV     Specific Malignancies in the Small Animal Patient


            In cats with small intestinal adenocarcinoma, there is signif-  months. 444,461  For details about outcome after treatment for
         icant perioperative risk, but cats that live beyond 2 weeks may   alimentary lymphoma see Chapter 33, Sections A and B. 
         experience long-term control with surgery alone (Fig. 23.30).
  VetBooks.ir  In two series, all cats that did not have their tumors resected   Large Intestine
                                                        After
                                                               There are various approaches for removal of tumors from the large
                                                  444,458
         were euthanized or died within 2 weeks of surgery.
         surgical resection, one-half of cats in one report and all cats   intestine based on the size, location, and depth of penetration of
         in another study died within 2 weeks of surgery, and 4 of 11   the mass. Generally, for rectal mucosal masses suspected to be
         cats surviving beyond 2 weeks died within 2 months of com-  benign polyps, the masses can be removed via mucosal eversion
         plications or other nontumor causes. 444,458,462  For eleven of   and submucosal resection. 535  Transrectal endoscopic removal of
         the 12 cats that survived 2 weeks beyond surgery, mean ST   benign canine rectal tumors can be considered if more extensive
         was 15 months, although in another report the MST was 2.5   surgery is required because of the location of the tumor. Using
                                                               this technique, five of six dogs showed significant improvement
                                                               in quality of life and three dogs were cured; however, one dog
                                                               died due to rectal perforation, which is a known complication
                                                               of this procedure. 536  The other disadvantage of this technique
                                                               is there is often incomplete removal of the mass, as it is usually
                                                               removed piecemeal. In a recent case report, this technique was
                                                               modified to inject saline to separate the mucosa from the submu-
                                                               cosa to improve visibility and the ability to completely remove










            A













                                                               • Fig. 23.29  Cecal gastrointestinal stromal tumor seen at exploratory lapa-
                                                               rotomy. Note the darkly colored perforated area of the tumor that led to
                                                               septic peritonitis in this dog. (Courtesy Dr. E. A. Maxwell, University of
                                                               Illinois, College of Veterinary Medicine.)

            B

















            C
                                                               • Fig. 23.30  Intestinal obstruction as a result of adenocarcinoma (white
         • Fig. 23.28  Intestinal lymphoma in a dog (A). The specimen is shown after   arrow). Note the distention of the jejunum oral to the mass compared with
         resection and anastomosis (B) and on cross-section (C) to illustrate the   the normal diameter aboral to the mass. There is also an enlarged lymph
         marked thickening of the bowel wall. (Courtesy Dr. Eric Pope, Ross Uni-  node (black arrow). (Courtesy Dr. Eric Pope, Ross University, College of
         versity, College of Veterinary Medicine.)             Veterinary Medicine.)
   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493