Page 134 - CL How to Read a Case Study
P. 134

From the website printouts "it could not be concluded

               whether, or how, a purchase could be made or an order could
               be placed", the EUIPO said.



               "Even if the websites provided such an option, there is no

               information of a single order being placed." (Ref 3)


               January 2019 the Irish fast food chain won the trademark

               case when An EU court (European Union Intellectual

               Property Office), revoked all rights for the words "Big Mac"


               as they relate to goods or restaurants across the EU.


               For McDonagh “the Big Mac is a burger. It's not a restaurant

               chain. And accordingly, they felt that even though it had been in

               existence since 1996, they felt it wasn't a genuine objection."

               (Ref 1)



               McDonagh said that the ruling was a positive step towards
               curtailing McDonald's tactic of registering trademarks across

               the world in advance, which restricted smaller businesses

               like Supermac's from growing their brand. He quoted

               examples of registration by McDonalds such as "McCountry,
               McFamily, McInternet, including the registration of the

               brand SnackBox, which was one of Supermac’s most

               popular products, even though the product was not actually

               offered by McDonalds. The EU was basically saying you
               either use it or lose it.



               This was not the first time a European court had ruled on
               McDonald’s rights to use prefixes: In 2016, the company

               won a case against a Singaporean company that had

               registered MacCoffee as a European Union trademark. (Ref 2)
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139