Page 134 - CL How to Read a Case Study
P. 134
From the website printouts "it could not be concluded
whether, or how, a purchase could be made or an order could
be placed", the EUIPO said.
"Even if the websites provided such an option, there is no
information of a single order being placed." (Ref 3)
January 2019 the Irish fast food chain won the trademark
case when An EU court (European Union Intellectual
Property Office), revoked all rights for the words "Big Mac"
as they relate to goods or restaurants across the EU.
For McDonagh “the Big Mac is a burger. It's not a restaurant
chain. And accordingly, they felt that even though it had been in
existence since 1996, they felt it wasn't a genuine objection."
(Ref 1)
McDonagh said that the ruling was a positive step towards
curtailing McDonald's tactic of registering trademarks across
the world in advance, which restricted smaller businesses
like Supermac's from growing their brand. He quoted
examples of registration by McDonalds such as "McCountry,
McFamily, McInternet, including the registration of the
brand SnackBox, which was one of Supermac’s most
popular products, even though the product was not actually
offered by McDonalds. The EU was basically saying you
either use it or lose it.
This was not the first time a European court had ruled on
McDonald’s rights to use prefixes: In 2016, the company
won a case against a Singaporean company that had
registered MacCoffee as a European Union trademark. (Ref 2)