Page 18 - NYSAGD GP Fall 2018
P. 18

“Composite Button Try:” A Novel Technique for Shade Matching

                                           By Arthur R. Volker, DDS, MSEd, FAGD
                                   Serhat Kokens, DDS, PhD Candidate (University of Siena)


        The robustness of modern comprehensive  photographs should be judiciously studied.  ways. First, it was converted to grayscale
        direct composite resin systems allows the  If possible, a large screen should be utilized  as a means to evaluate the value or enamel
        clinician to create life-like restorations that  for easier assessment.   shade (Figure 4). Also, a cross-polarized
        can seamlessly mimic nature. The ability to
        do so lies in the dentist’s ability to properly  Essentially, the technique uses 0.5mm in-
        combine  color, shape, and translucency /  crements of composite “balls” placed on an
        opacity. Often, while the shape of the res-  adjacent tooth and cured (Figure 1), then
        toration may be accurate, a discrepancy in  photographed  and analyzed.  Typically,
        color can lead to dissatisfaction for both the  dentin shades are placed along the cervical,
        dentist and patient.                 and enamel shades towards the incisal. It is
                                             imperative that the balls are placed quick-
        There  are numerous methods  with  which
        to evaluate the proper color and translu-                                   Figure 4. Greyscale view of Figure 3 to
        cencies / opacities of the composite resto-                                 help assess value and composite selection.
        ration. While there are value-based guides
        and digital  shade matching  modalities                                   photo was taken  for further assessment 8
        available,  traditional  chroma-based shade                               (Figure 5).
        tabs are often employed  to shade match.
        These guides are often fabricated  from   Figure 1. Oblique view of composite buttons
        acrylic,  not  resin.  Matching  the  optical   placed on tooth for shade assessment.
        properties  of  dissimilar  materials  can  be  ly, and the teeth are kept hydrated. If not,
        challenging, and it has been shown that the  the tooth will dehydrate, and the color will
        shades of composite do not always match  change, often becoming lighter and chalk-
        those found on classic shade guides.  1  ier in appearance. This can negatively im-
                                             pact shade selection. 7
        In an effort to remedy this situation, custom
        shade tabs have been suggested.  To  ac-  Case Report
                                   2
        complish this, uniform composite masses  The patient, a 40-year-old male in good   Figure 5. Photo taken with a cross-polarized
        of composite resin are cured and polished,  general health, presented with a fractured   filter to further assess composite selection.
        then affixed to a tab. While this is an ef-  incisal edge of tooth #8 due to trauma (Fig-  Once the appropriate  shades were deter-
        fective method, the technique can be dif-  ure 2). To best determine the needed com-  mined, an intra-oral mock-up was per-
        ficult to manage if multiple manufactures                                 formed with composite to determine the
        or composite classifications (ie microfilled,                             morphology and occlusion  of the incisal
        nanohybrid) are found in a clinic or prac-                                edge, then the edge was indexed using
        tice. A more simple and direct, but no less                               PVS.  The  teeth  were  isolated  via  rubber
        effective  method,  can  be  to  employ  the                              dam and the index was tried in in to assure
        “Composite Button Try” technique.                                         accuracy  (Figure 6). Using a football  di-

        To understand how to best implement this
        technique, an understanding of the optical   Figure 2. Pre-op frontal view. Patient fractured
        properties of enamel and dentin need to be   the incisal edge of #8.
        explored. Dentin tends to be more opaque
        and saturated in color compared to enamel.  posite masses, composite balls of varying
        Enamel  tends  to  be  more  translucent  and  shades were placed on the adjacent cen-
        gray compared to dentin. Properly combin-  tral, and a photograph was  taken (Figure   Figure 6. PVS stent with mock-up and
        ing the best properties of both will result in  3).  To best assess  the needed composite   rubber dam in place.
        the desired outcome. 3,4,5,6         shades, the photograph was processed two
                                                                                  amond, #8 was prepared via a long facial
        To mimic nature, we should first observe                                  bevel (Figure 7). The mock-up was subse-
        the existing tooth structures.  The neigh-
        boring  tooth  should be  photographically
        examined  and  the  incisal  third,  in  partic-
        ular, should be analyzed, as it is the most
        variable in terms of translucency / opacity
        due, in part to the interplay of light between
        the layers of dentin and enamel. As such,
                                                Figure 3. Placement of composite    Figure 7. Preparation of long facial bevel
        www.nysagd.org l Fall 2018 l GP 18      buttons on tooth.                   to help mask composite tooth interface.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23