Page 21 - AQIF M1
P. 21

4
      18
                                                                   Philosophy and Fundamentals of Sharī’ah for Islamic Finance
                                                                                                         SHA0011

               UNIT 3:  SCHOOLS OF ISLAMIC LEGAL THOUGHT: SALIENT FEATURES
                          AND DIFFERENCES OF OPINION
               While it is true that the Qur’ān and the Prophetic traditions (Sunnah) are the
               main sources of Sharī’ah, the process of understanding them or adducing
               the specific rulings are subjected to human involvement.  That is to say,
               the detail of Sharī’ah rulings are not something that are ready-made in the
               sense that the Qur’ān and Sunnah provide detailed answers for each and
               every issue. Instead, the texts mainly consist of general principles, rules
               and numbers of precedent cases from which scholars and jurists adduce
               new ruling in accordance to specific methodologies.

               Given the nature of the Qur’ān and Sunnah, it gives an impression that
               understanding of  Sharī’ah is always open for interpretation and legal
               reasoning by mujtahid. Having said that, it is in no way to suggest that
               Sharī’ah rulings are developed by way of scholars’ intuition; instead, it
               is developed by way of interpretative process with strict adherence to
               well established methodologies. These methodologies were developed
               overtime  and  eventually  lead  to  the  emergence  of  Schools  of  Islamic
               Legal Thought (fiqh or madhāhib).

               There are four main Schools of Islamic Legal Thought (madhāhib) :

               The Ḥanafī Madhhab

               a.      The founder of the Ḥanafī madhhab is Imām Abu Ḥanīfah al-Nu’man ibn
                       Thabit ibn Zuta (80-150 A.H./700-768 A.D.).

               b.      He is considered as one of the greatest ḥadīth scholars (muḥaddith)
                       during his era. In other words, he was deemed to be the Greatest
                       Imām among the great ones.
               c.      Imām Abu Ḥanīfah was living in the lifetime of some of the Great
                       Companions like Anas ibn Mālik in Baṣrah, Sahl ibn Sa’ad in Madinah
                       and Abu al-Sufayl, Amir ibn Watilah in Mekkah.

               d.      However, according to the historians, he had never had the chance
                       to meet the companions, and had never narrated any Hadīth from
                       them. This means that Imām Abu Ḥanīfah was not a student of companions
                       (tābi‘in) but a follower of tābi‘in.

               e.      In spite of this, Imām Abu Ḥanīfah had the opportunity to meet some
                       other companions who granted him the title of a minor tābi‘in.
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26