Page 49 - C:\Users\lpnan\Documents\Flip PDF\revue ODF 1 2021\

Cone beam « low dose » et orthodontie : une nouvelle modalité d’imagerie

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

1. Abdelgawad F, Abd Alsamad A, Wassef NM. Low-dose CBCT for localization of impacted supernumerary teeth in children. Egyptian
Dental Journal 2020; 66 : 51-6.
2. Abdelkarim A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dentistry Journal 2019 ; 7 : 89.
3. Ahmed DF. Ultra-low-dose versus normal-dose scan protocol of planmeca promax 3 d mid CBCT machine in detection of second
mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars : an ex vivo study. Egyptian Dental Journal 2019; 65 : 221-9.

4. Almuqrin AH, Tamam N, Abdelrazig A et al. Organ dose and radiogenic risk in dental cone beam computed tomography
examinations. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2020; 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108971.
5. Al-Okshi A, Theodorakou C, Lindh C. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2017; 46: 20160311.
6. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S et al. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging or
localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33 : 93-102.
7. Alqerban A, Willems G, Bernaerts C. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records
versus 3D CBCT. Eur J orthod 2014; 36 : 698-707.
8. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, van Keirsbilck P et al. The effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction and its impact on the
orthodontic treatment outcome. J Orthodont Sci 2014; 3 : 34-40.
9. Applegate K, Cost N. Image Gently : A campaign to reduce children’s and adolescents’ risk for cancer during adulthood. J Adolesc
Health 2013; 52 : 93-7.
10. Attaia D, Ting S, Johnson B et al. Dose reduction in head and neck organs through shielding and application of different scanning
parameters in cone beam computed tomography: an effective dose study using an adult male anthropomorphic phantom. Oral
Maxillofacial Radiology 2020; 130(1) : 101-9.
11. Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo P et al. Two- versus three- dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J
Orthod 2011; 33 : 344-9.
12. Capar I, Ertas H, Arslan H et al. A retrospective comparative study of cone beam computed tomography versus renderedvpanoramic
images in identifying the presence, types, and characteristics of dens invaginatus in a Turkish population. Journal of Endodontics
2015; 41 : 473-8.
13. Chen H, Aarab G, de Ruiter MH et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the upper airway anatomy in obstructive sleep apnea: a
systematic review. Sleep Med. 2016; 21 : 19-27.
14. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a
systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38 : 609-25.
15. Döbelin Q, Stadlinger B, Wiedemeier DB. Detectability of Osseous Lesions with a Pre-Programmed Low-Dose Protocol for Cone-Beam
Computed Tomography. Appl Sci 2020; 10; doi:10.3390/app10144961.
16. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical
radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. International Endodontic Journal 2011; 44 : 136-47.
17. Eslami E, Katz E, Baghdady M et al. Are three-dimensional airway evaluations obtained through computed and cone beam computed
tomography scans predictable from lateral cephalograms? A systematic review of evidence. Angle Orthod 2016; 87 : 159-67.
18. European Commission. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. Radiation Protection 136. 2004. 115p.
19. European Commission. Radiation protection No 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines.
2012. 156p.
20. Fédération Française d’Orthodontie. Indications et champ d’application du cone beam (CBCT) en Orthodontie - Recommandations
de Bonne Pratique. Mai 2017. 55p.
21. Garib D, Yatabe M, Ozawa T et al. Alveolar bone morphology in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate in the mixed
dentition: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2012; 49 : 208-14.
22. Goodell K, Mines P, Kersten D. Impact of cone beam computed tomography on treatment planning for external cervical resorption and
a Novel Axial Slice-based Classification System. Journal of Endodontics 2018; 44 : 239-44.

RODF 2021;55(1):29-51 49

21/01/2021 16:19
RODF-2021-1.indb 49 21/01/2021 16:19
RODF-2021-1.indb 49