Page 50 - C:\Users\lpnan\Documents\Flip PDF\revue ODF 1 2021\

J.-M. Foucart, N. Papelard, L. Petitpas, J. Bourriau

23. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and conebeam computed tomography volumetric
images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137 : 590-7.
24. Hoffman F, Kocher D, Apostoaei A. Beyond dose assessment: Using risk with full disclosure of uncertainty in public and scientific
communication. Health Phys 2011; 101 : 591-600.
25. Isaacson K, Thom A, Atack N et al. Orthodontic Radiographs : Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics, 4th ed.
British Orthodontic Society 2015.
26. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral
Health 2018; 18:88. doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
27. Jaju P, Jaju P. Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2015; 45 :
263-5.
28. Janssen N, Schreurs R, Bittermann G et al. A novel semi-automatic segmentation protocol for volumetric assessment of alveolar cleft
grafting procedures. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2017; 45 : 685-9.
29. Jawad Z and all. A review of cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of root resorption associated with impacted canines,
introducing an innovative root resorption scale. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016. 122 : 765-71.
30. Katheria B, Kau C, Tate R et al. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus
cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent 2010; 32 : 304-9.
31. Kuijpers M, Chiu Y, Nada R et al. Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal
morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: a systematic review. PLoS One 2014; 9 : e93442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093442.
Collection 2014.
32. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and
adolescents: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-
00493-x.
33. Lai C, Bornstein M, Mock L et al. Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using
cone beam computed tomography. European Journal of Orthodontics 2013; 35 : 529-38.
34. Landin M, Jadhav A, Yadav S et al. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-cone beam Tomography
for surgical placement of mini implants. Angle Orthodontist 2015; 85 : 446-53.
35. Liljeholm R, Kadesjo N, Benchimol D. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic
assessment: An in vitro study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017; 10(3) : 351-9.
36. Lisboa O, Masterson D, Motta A et al. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a
systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23 : 112-9.
37. Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, White S. Patient Risk Related to Common Dental Radiographic Examinations: The Impact of 2007
International Commission on Radiological Protection Recommendations Regarding Dose Calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 :
1237-43.
38. Ludlow J, Walker C. Phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2013; 144 : 802-17.
39. Ludlow JB. Dosimetry of CS 8100 CBCT Unit and CS 9300 Low-Dose Protocol. 2014.

40. Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT - a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine
CBCT units. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2015; 44 : 20140197.
41. Ludlow JB, Koivisto J. Dosimetry of orthodontic diagnostic FOVs using low dose CBCT protocol. IADR 2015.
42. Machado GL. CBCT imaging – A boon to orthodontics. Saudi Dental Journal 2015; 27 : 12-21.
43. Nascimento HA, Andrade ME, Frazao MA. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for
TMJ. Braz Dent J 2017; 28(4) : 511-6.

44. McGuigan MB, Duncan H, Horner K. An analysis of effective dose optimization and its impact on image quality and diagnostic
efficacy relating to dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Swiss Dental Journal 2018; 128 : 297-316.
45. Mossaz J, Kloukos D, Pandis N et al. Morphologic characteristics,vlocation, and associated complications of maxillary and mandibular
supernumerary teeth as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography. European Journal of Orthodontics 2014; 36 : 708-18.

50 RODF 2021;55(1):29-51

21/01/2021 16:19
RODF-2021-1.indb 50
RODF-2021-1.indb 50 21/01/2021 16:19