Page 51 - C:\Users\lpnan\Documents\Flip PDF\revue ODF 1 2021\

Cone beam « low dose » et orthodontie : une nouvelle modalité d’imagerie

46. Neelapu B, Kharbanda O, Sardana H et al. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in adult obstructive sleep apnea patients : A
systematic review and meta-analysis of cephalometric studies. Sleep Med Rev 2016; 31 : 79-90.

47. Oberoi S, Chigurupati R, Gill P et al. Volumetric assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using cone beam computed
tomography. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2009; 46 : 503-51.
48. Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R et al. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol
2018; 48 : 308-16.
49. Oenning AC, Pauwels R, Stratis A. Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric cone beam CT. Sci Rep 2019; 9 :
5521.
50. Pittayapat P, Limchaichana-Bolstad N, Willems G et al. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic
review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17 : 69-91.
51. Portelli M, Militi A, Giudice AL et al. 3D Assessment of Endodontic Lesions with a Low-Dose CBCT Protocol. Dent J 2020; 8:
doi:10.3390/dj8020051.
52. Ren H, Chen J, Deng F et al. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for detecting simulated
apical root resorption. The Angle Orthodontist 2013; 83 : 189-95.
53. Smektała T, Jędrzejewski M, Szyndel J et al. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry : a systematic
review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 : 1795-801.
54. Starbuck JM, Ghoneima A, Kula K. A multivariate analysis of unilateral cleft lip and palate facial skeletal morphology. The Journal of
Craniofacial Surgery 2015; 26 : 1673-8.
55. Ting S, Attaia D, Johnson K et al. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone beam
computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis? Angle Orthodontist, 2002; 90(5) : 655-
64.
56. Toureno L, Park J, Cederberg R et al. Identification of supernumerary teeth in 2D and 3D : review of literature and a proposal. J Dent
Educ 2013; 77 : 43-5.

57. Tsolakis A, Kalavritinos M, Bitsanis E. et al. Reliability of different radiographic methods for the localization of displaced maxillary
canines. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2018; 153 : 308-14.
58. White SC, Scarfe WC, Schulze RKW et al. The Image Gently in Dentistry campaign: promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial
radiology in dentistry for children. OOOO 2014 ; 118 : 257-61.

59. Widmann G, Bischel A, Stratis A et al. Spatial and contrast resolution of ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging using iterative
reconstruction technology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2017; 46, 20160452.
60. Zhou W, Li W, Lin J et al. Tooth lengths of the permanent upper incisors in patients with cleft lip and palate determined with cone
beam computed tomography. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 2013; 50 : 88-95.

RODF 2021;55(1):29-51 51

21/01/2021 16:19
RODF-2021-1.indb 51 21/01/2021 16:19
RODF-2021-1.indb 51