Page 226 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 226

Prior to identifying that the Albany New York Community Conversation could word as the

               source for my data gathering, contact and outreach was made with organizers of various similar


               efforts  around  the  state  to  inform  them  of  my  research  and  solicit  permission  to  attend  the

               respective gatherings for the purpose of making informal observation with the hope of canvassing


               participant volunteers for data gathering. My intent was to gather data from public dialogues and

               civic events that I could attend and informally observe participant interactions during the dialogue


               process. Doing so would allow myself exposure to a broader audience of perspective participants

               for interviews and contributed to data acquisition in a succinct amount of time.



                       Before the Albany CC, initial experimental participants were either students in my ITT

               Communications course or Group Theory class, while other volunteers or facilitators I selected

               had attended Community Conversations I convened in the past and others contacted had partaken


               with me in dialogues on a variety of subjects that were convened prior to my dissertation proposal’s


               approval by the Western Institute for Social Research in Berkeley (WISR.edu) to begin.


                       To ensure the info and follow-up interviews was fresh, I set a limit of 10 days between the

               actual CC event and the date of the data gathering to assure that participants retained a high degree


               of recall about their dialogue experiences and resulting reflections pertaining to their attending the

               Community Conversation, participant interactions among group members, and lessons learned.



                       One  goal  of  the  data  gathering  process  was  to  include  a  broadly  diverse  group  of

               participants,  to  the  extent  allowed  through  participant  self-selection.  Initially,  any  individual


               participating in the Albany CC dialogue on Implicit Bias had an opportunity to contribute data

               through the survey interview process. Tracking the demographics of participants completing the

               interviews, combined with the technique of snowballing aided in reaching a more diverse pool of


               interviewees, which of course was limited to the universe of individuals who attended one or more

                                                             207
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231