Page 247 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 247

roles that ranged from serving as a guide to those who were new to the process, injecting thoughtful

               questions into the dialogue and sharing their own personal experiences with race and racism.



                       The National Issues Forum (NIF) (2013) advises that some roles of dialogue moderator or

               facilitator include providing overview of the deliberation process, asking probing questions about


               what is at stake in each issue and each option, encouraging participants to direct their questions

               and responses to one another, and remaining neutral. The issue of neutrality by facilitators or


               moderators  evokes  differing  opinions  from  scholars  and  experts  in  the  practice  of  civic  and

               deliberative dialogue. This was not the case in the first Albany CC event as it was mostly lecture.



                       The first Albany Community Conversation was well attended but it lacked genuine group

               dialogue  which  I  found  disappointing  since  it  was  named  and  promoted  as  a  “Community


               Conversation”, despite Albany’s Mayor and Police Chief being present, the first CC event only

               had one presenter who lectured the full length of time about what ‘Implicit Bias’ was and while

               educational on its impact on society, again unfortunately, there was no participant discussion of it.



                       This to me was totally opposite of what a Community Conversation was meant to be –

               involved  participation  and  dialogue  from  members  of  the  community.  The  dominant  lecture


               seemed as described by Freire in Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1998), a “banking” assumption that

               an expert lecture “deposits” knowledge to the audience, who then store or “bank” that knowledge.



                       The intention of a group or a host entity putting together a Community Conversation is to

               serve a cause of betterment and promote community involvement so kudos for everyone involved


               in doing that.  The remaining three Albany CC events were more aligned to the principals of civic

               engagement where deliberative group dialogue and public direct participation in a real dialogue


               took place as true Community Conversations ought to model, so this experience was good to reveal



                                                             228
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252