Page 250 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 250

issue. Structured dialogue processes can build important relationships among people who did not

               previously know, trust or empathize with each other, and thus, increase one's competence and


               confidence in interacting with people of different races and ethnicities. They can also help people

               explore an issue from multiple perspectives, as a starting point for planning strategies or motivating


               actions. (www.racialequitytools.org/act/strategies/dialogue-and-deliberation)


                       The Community Conversation sessions that were the subject of data gathering for this


               research included a long-term goal of community-based issue identification and action, however,

               the immediate objective was simply exploring the participant’s concept of ‘community’ and how


               an enriching dialogue can foster healing and improve relationships among residents of within a

               community. The design for interpreting locally-based dialogues used in some of my research were

               based on the NIF model explained herein, however, not all aspects of the model were used.



               II. Case Study No. 2: Milwaukee, Wisconsin - Spring 2018



                       This report details dialogue themes emerging from the first “Red & Blue Dialogue,” a

               conversation series sponsored by the Millennial Action Project and facilitated by the Zeidler

               Center. The FIRST dialogue took place on Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at the Pabst Best Place


               (bar restaurant) in Milwaukee where I co-facilitated at table #8.


                       The purpose of the Red & Blue Dialogue series was to start a series of group dialogues


               among (Red) Republicans and (Blue) Democrats including independents.


                       While open to anyone to come and participate, people were asked which side of the


               spectrum they favored (Conservative views vs Liberal) and this coding was an attempt to

               place  participants  with  mixed  views  to  sit  together  at  their  assigned  tables  in  balanced

               numbers.



                                                             231
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255