Page 249 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 249

Community Conversations on Race and Implicit Bias as a Forum Model



                       As described in Chapters I and II, civic engagement through group dialogue is a public

               endeavor designed to consider or ‘take on’ topics of concern to communities. As such, Community

               Conversations  potentially  can  result  in  many  benefits  to  civic  life  as  an  orientation  toward


               constructive communication, dispel stereotypes, provide a venue for new ideas, and invoke deep

               listening  and  understanding  of  the  other  (Yankelovich,  2001),  while  traditional  deliberative


               dialogue is based on the use of collective critical thinking and reasoned argument that allows

               participants to make decisions on community issues and public policy. (Johnson and Mutchler


               1999)


                       AnimatingDemocracy.org has defined civic dialogue to specifically refer to dialogue about


               civic issues, policies, or decisions of consequence to people’s lives, communities, and society.

               Meaningful civic dialogue is intentional and purposeful. Dialogue organizers have a sense of what

               difference they hope to make through civic dialogue and participants are informed about why the


               dialogue is taking place and what may result. The difference in my research is defining the focus

               of civic dialogue of which my objectors may say is not about the process of dialogue itself. Nor is


               its intent solely therapeutic or to nurture personal growth. Rather, these dialogues address a matter

               of civic importance to the dialogue participants. (animatingdemocracy.org/terms/civic-dialogue).



                       Dialogue  strategies  are  linked  with  community  engagement  strategies,  focusing  on

               bringing people together to discuss a particular concern or issue, and/or to build relationships.


               Many groups describe these strategies as methods for practicing democracy and for raising the

               voices of marginalized groups, and/or of multiple perspectives in a community. Some dialogue

               processes are designed explicitly as a first step towards action and change; some are not.


               Most share goals of increasing the number of perspectives that are brought to bear on a community

                                                             230
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254