Page 55 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 55

included auditing aspects of the Metasphere affected dynamics such as location, ease of access,

               lighting, room temperature, acoustics, availability of food, drink and the seating arrangements, etc.



                       The purpose of informally observing the physical setting in which the public engagement

               occurred is to understand how the setting may or may not affect participant interactions. Civic


               engagement and deliberative democracy can create an environment where people engage together,

               in ways that transcends self-interest, to acceptance of new perspectives and transformation. My


               interest is not how these groups function in general, but how participants and facilitators create

               Metasphere  for  sharing  diverse  and  divergent  perspectives  and  opinions  and  their  personal


               experiences during these encounters. Deliberative democracy (DD) is an appraised ideal that has

               been the subject to extensive research (Gutmann & Thompson, 2004; Habermas, 1989; James,

               2004;  Rostboll,  2008).  Broadly  defined,  deliberative  democracy  aspires  the  decision-making


               legitimacy by deliberation of equal citizens. Instead of exercising the deliberation for the people,

               the DD theory encourages deliberation by the people (Fishkin 2009).



                       From the DD theory perspective – and without ignoring the other attributes or methods of

               democracy (such as the rule of law or voting) – a political system’s democratic status can be


               appraised  by  the  status  of  its  deliberative  practices  (Dryzek  2009).  There  is  scant  research,

               however, about how individuals engage in ‘being aware’ of these perceptions and not much about


               the dialogue experience of working through dominance and disagreements arising specifically in

               the course of civic and deliberative processes. Topics that bridge differences such as talking about

               race, implicit bias and the political divide do this.  My research if capsulized focused on extending


               the literature about the insights gained by participants and facilitators during difficult points of the

               dialogue exchange and by examining quantum features or aspects of the Metasphere setting itself.





                                                             36
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60