Page 51 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 51

a new course of action. He and the other contributors (Will Friedman, Keith Melville, Robert

               Kingston,  Alison  Kadlec,  Steven  A.  Rosell,  and  Heidi  Gantwerk)  describe  methods  used  by


               organizations  like  Public  Agenda,  National  Issues  Forums,  and  Viewpoint  Learning,  Inc.,  to

               advance  the  public’s  learning  curve  through  various  forms  of  civic  engagement,  education,


               dialogue and deliberation. (https://muse.jhu.edu/chapter/38393)


                       Within the context of deliberative democracy and dialogue, coming to public judgment is


               an  expression  that  refers  to  heightening  awareness  through  education,  bringing  individuals

               together with different perspectives to forge alliances, or simply sharing ideas and viewpoints with


               others. In identifying the process of arriving at a point of public judgment, Yankelovich (2001)

               described a progression of events among those gathered for dialogue comprised of consciousness

               raising,  followed  by  working  through,  and,  lastly,  resolution.  Although  the  goal  of  public


               engagement process is ultimately consensus and resolution, the bridge between this endpoint and


               the  initial  activity  of  awareness  and  education  is  the  important  step  of  working  through.

               Yankelovich described working through as a process of transition and change.


                       While Yankelovich’s research considers ‘working through’ from the perspective of public


               opinion and the media, the research for this effort will center on the fundamental interactions that

               occur among individuals in a group dialogue that might be typically observed in a Community


               Conversation  setting  describing  what  occurs  during  the  working  through  process.  Civic

               engagement and participatory methods of convening, along with dialogue processes, allow for


               greater participant voice and involvement in decision-making which should allow for a wider

               opening of free expression and interaction of these processes. The act of community-based civic


               engagement  through  dialogue,  as  evidenced  through  careful  convening,  requires  that  those





                                                             32
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56