Page 48 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 48

Yankelovich  commented  that  working  through  is  typically  not  about  the  introduction  of  new

               information, because “people engaged in working through may have all the information they need


               long before they are willing to confront the cross pressures that ensnare them” (p. 65).


                       While Yankelovich (2001) described the shift that occurs in civic and deliberative dialogue


               processes as a process in which conversations move from politeness to difficult and hard issues as

               “working through” (p. 64), Saunders (2001) detailed an approach for challenging and changing


               conflictual  relationships  through  sustained  engagement.  Saunders  identified  six  elements

               (“identity,  interests  and  interdependence,  continuing  interaction,  effective  power,  limits  on


               behavior, and evolving perceptions”) (pp. 36-41) of relationship that contribute to change and

               promote  working  through  when  combined  with  a  sustained  process  of  civic  and  deliberative

               dialogue. Another perspective about the concept of working through comes from the literature on


               group development which works through its stages as long as the group commits to stay together.


                       I taught college level courses in Group Theory enrolling my students into conducting off


               campus  dialogue  research  and  we  experimented  in  class  practicing  Community  Conversation

               facilitation concepts working through disagreements and differences of opinion.  This experience


               will be included and further reported on in my supplemental notes along with covering important

               related  literature  studying  group  development  (Tuckman,  1965;  Tuckman  &  Jensen,  1977;


               Wheelan, 1994) In my studies, I found it useful to research understanding the ability of groups to

               interrelate and what it takes to grow their comfort level as the relationships evolved and discussions


               progressed. Wheelan (1994) and Tuckman and Jensen (1997) documented the ability of personal

               and social group interactions to change and transform over time and I found this to be true with


               my students and their interactions with their fellow classmates reflected in the larger view in how

               I saw the facilitation of their off-campus group interactions which they reported on. I found these


                                                             29
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53