Page 49 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 49
Community Conversations can reflect a practice that operationalizes group development theories
and enlivens concepts. I will describe some processes and review results from those interactions.
Research Questions in Participatory and Deliberative Practice
For all the recent discussion on the virtues and vices of public deliberation, surprisingly
little attention has been given to how deliberative procedures actually operate in different contexts.
Over the past 30 years, the practice of participatory civic engagement has grown in popularity as
a tool for helping citizens address locally based concerns and determining appropriate courses of
action. During that period, scholars have investigated deliberation and deliberative democracy for
its conditions, purposes, and features as a civic approach for broad-based public interaction.
Deliberative democracy recognizes a conflict of interest between the citizen participating, those
affected or victimized by the process being undertaken, and the group-entity that organizes the
decision. Thus, it usually involves an extensive outreach effort to include marginalized, isolated,
ignored groups in decisions, and to extensively document dissent, grounds for dissent, and future
predictions of consequences of actions. It focuses as much on the process as the results. In this
form its very involved as a complete theory of civics. (Brennan 2017 p.98)
On the other hand, many practitioners of deliberative democracy attempt to be as neutral
and open-ended as possible, inviting (or even randomly selecting) people who represent a wide
range of views and providing them with balanced materials to guide their discussions. Examples
include National Issues Forums, the Millennium Action Project (that I am participating in),
Choices for the 21st Century, the Citizens' Initiative Review, and the 21st-century town meetings
convened by AmericaSpeaks, among other study groups, deliberative opinion polls, etc. mentioned
earlier that are organized with national leadership. In most of these causes, deliberative democracy
30