Page 8 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of societal change and expanding deliberative democracy

research utilizing proactive participatory stakeholder dialogue, using empirical material from

gatherings called “Community Conversations” currently trending across America. In addition, the

author researches historical contexts of civic engagement and explores firsthand the experience

of facilitation and participant exchange focusing on the relationship dynamics of conflict and

resolution aspects that are found within these group processes. The experience of dialogues that

the author participated in were considered of which a four-part series in Albany New York is

studied. This research identified and analyzed functions (key processes) needed for the effort of

Community Conversations to succeed. Using the functions as a heuristic to analyze and present

this material, this paper shows combining evolving input approaches can result in group process

exchanges that are richer and deeper in their comprehension and ability to deal with a multitude

of social issues that these dialogue groups often take on. Where innovative group processes and

research have yet to venture with no literature found that has inquired to this depth, the author

sought to go further deeper into dimensions of self-projection that contrasts community creation

against group dynamics where meaningful exchange of ideas can lead to structural innovation,

neighborhood improvement and citizen empowerment reaching into a realm where the dialogue

itself contributes to a better understanding of these. In contrast to systems research where the

researcher defines system boundaries, the dialogue allowed system boundaries to be defined along

the process in a bottom-up manner. This resulted in different ideas about how to approach and

deal with future challenges and opportunities. Furthermore, the functions of Community

Conversations (in conclusion) serve as useful practices in creating positive sustainable options

when group input is valued and best practices adopted it represents hope for aligned humanity.

vi