Page 10 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 10

self-determination, and impact) is reviewed and theoretical logic is developed linking the four

               dimensions to specific outcomes. The results, largely consistent across two case studies of group


               dialogues in two different cities, suggest that no single dimension predicts all three outcomes. It

               seems that participants in dialogue need to experience each of the empowerment dimensions in


               order to achieve all of the hoped for outcomes of empowerment. Theoretical propositions emerged

               which convey new understanding about the ways deliberative dialogue can be used to engage


               participants  confronted  by  difficult  topics  for  group  consideration  including  ‘implicit  biases’,

               themes of race and racism, dealing with a burdened criminal justice system, and more that result


               in participant shifts in perspective.  It is this exploration into how new understanding gained and

               discovering how insights are generated during the CC process that makes this dissertation unique.


                       Community  Conversations  as  a  direct  from  of  democratic  deliberation  and  civic

               engagement puts everyday people at the center of local problem solving. As a form of local input

               and participation, it equips local groups with an approach and practice for tackling difficult issues


               through  authentic  conversations  that  build  relationships  and  offers  a  means  for  peeling  back

               divergent thoughts, opinions, and interests. The civics lesson we never had and the lack of deep


               dialogue literature points to a vacuum reveals much is unknown about the emotional mechanics of

               local group exchange, confrontation and opposition during a deliberative dialogue. The approach


               this research utilized produced four newer theoretical propositions that interwoven adds to the

               literature and dimension of scholarly research on civic engagement lends understanding about how


               sustained deliberative dialogue promotes grassroots leadership, and creates a “meta” environment

               of civility and working through (Yankelovich, 1991) for healthier, more productive communities.


                       A theoretical perspective is a set of assumptions about reality that inform the questions we

               ask and the kinds of answers we arrive at as a result. In this sense for this dissertation, 4 theoretical









                                                             viii
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15