Page 9 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 9

Approach & Process



                       Using a basic approach of applied grounded theory as a methodology the author set out to

               delve  into  awareness  experiences  from  participating  in  Community  Conversations  (CC)  via

               personal observation contrasted with a textual database (such as reading a corpus of field notes)


               from  facilitated  dialogues  and  follow-up  interviews  using  noted  points  and  labeled  variables

               (categories, concepts and properties) were closely examined for their interrelationships. The ability


               to  perceive  variables  and  relationships  is  termed  "theoretical  sensitivity"  and  is  affected  by  a

               number of things including my reading of the literature and one's use of techniques designed to


               enhance sensitivity. Grounded theory methodology was used to analyze qualitative research data

               collected from participant volunteers and facilitators. A constructivist approach, grounded theory


               allows for evaluation of the interactions of participants derived from informal observations of the

               deliberative dialogue process and from research data gathered through semi-structured interviews,


               open and axial coding, and constant comparison. With access to extensive literature, data archives

               and comparing facilitation notes from previous dialogues I was able to construct a comprehensive

               quilt of participant perspectives and analysis.


                       Within the context of personality psychology, a "dimension" refers to a continuum on

               which an individual can have various levels of a characteristic, in contrast to the dichotomous


               categorical approach in which an individual does or does not possess a characteristic.  This paper

               evolved from examining various attributes and characteristics participants in dialogue displayed


               and I saw how the contributions of studied persons might fit into the four dimensions in Thomas

               &  Velthouse's  (1990)  multidimensional  conceptualization  of  psychological  empowerment  in

               predicting three expected outcomes of empowerment: effectiveness, work satisfaction, and job-


               related strain. The literature on the four dimensions of empowerment (i.e., meaning, competence,








                                                             vii
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14