Page 364 - Nutrition Counseling and Education Skills: A Guide for Professionals

2014;134:194–195.
11. Scott D. New Perspectives on Curriculum, Learning and Assessment. New York, NY: Springer; 2016.
12. Caine RN, Caine G. Natural Learning for a Connected World. Education, Technology, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Teachers’

College Press; 2011.
13. Wittwer J, Renkl A. How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educ Psychol Rev.

2010;22:393–409.
14. Monroe JT. Mindful eating: principles and practice. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015;9:217–220.
15. Sleddens EF, Kroeze W, Kohl LF, et al. Correlates of dietary behavior in adults: an umbrella review. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:477–499.
16. Harris JE, Gleason PM, Sheean PM, et al. An introduction to qualitative research for food and nutrition professionals. J Am Diet Assoc.

2009;109:80–90.
17. Magids S, Zorfas A, Leemon D. The new science of customer emotions: a better way to drive profit and profitability. Harv Bus Rev.

2015;97:68–74.
18. Graham DJ, Heidrick C, Hodgin K. Nutrition label viewing during food-selection task: Front-of-package labels vs nutrition facts labels. J

Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:1636–1646.
19. Murphy KE, De Villiers A, Ketterer E, et al. Using formative research to develop a nutrition education resource aimed at assisting low-

income households in South Africa adopt a healthier diet. Health Educ Res. 2015;30:882–896.
20. Mager RF. Preparing Instructional Objectives: A Critical Tool in the Development of Effective Instruction. 3rd ed. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press;

1997.
21. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: Longman; 1956. (Copyright renewed 1984

by Bloom BS, Krathwohl D.)
22. Anderson LW, Sosniak LA, eds. Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty-Year Retrospective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 1994.
23. Anderson LW, Krathwohl D, eds. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives. New York, NY: Longman; 2001.
24. Krathwohl D, Bloom BS, Masia B. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York, NY: David McKay;

1964.
25. Simpson E. The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House; 1972.
26. Harrow A. A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain. New York, NY: David McKay; 1972.
27. Robbins SP, Judge TA. Essentials of Organizational Behavior. 16th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2014.

Chapter 12: Implementing and Evaluating Learning

1. Lucas RW. Energize Your Training: Creative Techniques to Engage Learners. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press; 2010.
2. Rosciano A. The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teach Learn Nurs.

2015;10:93–99.
3. Wittwer J, Renkl A. How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educ Psychol Rev.

2010;22:393–409.
4. Scott D. New Perspectives on Curriculum, Leaning and Assessment. New York, NY: Springer; 2016.
5. Rosas LC, Thlyagarajan S, Goldstein BA, et al. The effectiveness of two community-based weight loss strategies among obese, low-income

US Latinos. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:537–550.
6. Ptorney LT, Willis EA, Honas JJ, et al. Validity of energy intake estimated by digital photography plus recall in overweight and obese

young adults. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115:1392–1399.
7. Caine RN, Caine G. Natural Learning for a Connected World. Education, Technology, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Teachers’

College Press; 2011.
8. Beck AM, Christensen AG, Hansen BS, et al. Multidisciplinary nutrition support for undernutrition in nursing home and home care: a

cluster randomized controlled trial. Nutrition. 2016;32:199–205. doi:10.106//j.nut.2015.08.009.
9. Henry BW, Smith TJ. Evaluation of the FOCUS (feedback on counseling using simulation) instrument for assessment of client-centered

nutrition counseling. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42:57–62.
10. Monroe JT, Lofgren IE, Sartini BL, et al. The Green Eating Project: web-based intervention to promote environmentally conscious eating

behaviours in US university students. Public Health Nutr. 2015:18;2368–2378.
11. Baim S. Digital storytelling: conveying the essence of a face-to-face lecture in an on-line learning environment. J Effective Teaching.

2015;15:47–58.
12. Holthaus V, Sergais G, Rohrig I, et al The impact of interprofessional simulation on dietetic student perception of communication,

decision-making, roles, and self-efficacy. Top Clin Nutr. 2015;30:127–142.

364