Page 220 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education
P. 220

Prospective EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Using CALL in the Classroom



                   Table 1. The demographics of the participants

                                              Variables                               n              %
                    Gender                                        Male                37            34.9
                                                                 Female               69            65.1
                    Age                                          18-19                1              . 9
                                                                 20-21                73            68.9
                                                                 22-23                21            19.8
                                                                  24+                 11            10.4
                    Year at the department                         3                  51            48.1
                                                                   4                  47            44.3
                                                                  4+                  8              7.5



                   address the perceptions and attitudes of the PTs with regards to the use of CALL resources. Therefore,
                   descriptive statistics were calculated and reported. The reliability of the scale was found high in the
                   analysis (23 items, α=. 952). After conducting the reliability analysis for the required items, descriptive
                   statistics focusing on the mean and standard deviation of the items were analyzed. The items were listed
                   according to descending values of the analysis (see Table 2).
                      According to the descriptive analysis of the scale, PTs agreed on the statement that using technol-
                   ogy is a good idea (M=6.67), and they referred to their future plans as they plan to use technology in
                   their future classrooms (M=4.65) because they believed that technology will be useful in their English
                   language teaching practices (M=4.55). According to the descriptive statistics, PTs believed that they
                   feel comfortable using technology in an English language classroom (M=4.22) and reflected on their
                   intentions to use technology as soon as they start teaching English (M=4.31).
                      In terms of PTs confidence of using technology in their future classrooms, PTs believed that they
                   could easily use technology on their own in the classes (M=4.24) and they feel that technological tools
                   will be easy to use in an English language classroom (M=4.22). Similarly, PTs highly believed that
                   incorporating technology in their future English language classroom will be easy (M=4.10). By look-
                   ing at the overall results, PTs beliefs about the usefulness of the technology tools in the classroom were
                   higher than their confidence in figuring out the ways of using technology in their classes. For instance,
                   PTs referred to their knowledge of using technology in an English language classroom (M=3.87) was
                   lower than their belief that technology is a good idea (M=4.67).
                      PTs not only asked to refer to their confidence and opinions in using technology in the classrooms,
                   they also referred to the extent to which they think that their students will benefit from incorporating
                   technology into the classrooms. According to the descriptive of the scale, PTs have high expectations
                   from using technology in their classrooms in terms of its potential to help students to learn more about
                   the topic of the lesson (M=4.17), improve the students’ satisfaction with the course (M=4.37), improve
                   students’ evaluation of the topic of the lesson (M=4.17), improve students’ grades (M=4. 12) and learn
                   better (M=4.36).










                                                                                                          201
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225