Page 86 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education
P. 86

A Paradigm Shift for Teachers’ Professional Development Structure in Turkey




                   Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years.
                   Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
                   Budak, Y., & Demirel, O. (2003). In-service training needs for teachers. Educational Administration in
                   Theory and Practice, 33(1), 62–81.

                   Bybee, R., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Advancing technology education: The role of professional
                   development. Technology Teacher, 60(2), 31–36.

                   Caglayan, N., Yesildag-Hasancebi, F., Tanriverdi, K., & Gunel, M. (2013). Implementation of the ar-
                   gumentation based science ınquiry approach to the targets of electricity unit. Paper presented at the
                   1st International Conference on Immersion Approaches to Argument-based Inquiry (ABI) for Science
                   Classrooms, Busan, Korea.

                   Cikmaz, A. (2014). Examining two Turkish Teachers’ Questionning Patterns in Secondary School Sci-
                   ence Classrooms. (Unpublished master thesis). University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

                   Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy
                   Evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

                   Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What
                   teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
                   Demir, M., Yesildag-Hasancebi, F., & Gunel, M. (2013). Unit Preparation Process in The Applications
                   of Argumentation Based Inquiry Approach. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Im-
                   mersion Approaches to Argument-based Inquiry (ABI) for Science Classrooms, Busan, Korea.
                   Directorate-General for Teacher Training and Development. (2014). 2013 In-Service Training Activity
                   Report. Ankara, Turkey: Author.

                   Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in
                   the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023007005
                   Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Thomko, T. N. (2005). Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z
                   Manual. The Critical Thinking Co.

                   Evans, T. P. (1986). Guidelines for effective science teacher inservice education programs: Perspectives
                   from research. In B. S. Spector (Ed.), A guide to inservice science teacher education: Research into
                   practice (pp. 13–56). Columbus, OH: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science and SMEAC
                   Information Reference Center.

                   Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve profes-
                   sional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–665. doi:10.1016/
                   S0742-051X(03)00059-3

                   Fok, S., Chan, K., Sin, K., Ng, A. H., &Yeung, A. S. (2005). In-Service Teacher Training Needs in Hong
                   Kong. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education,
                   Sydney, Australia.







                                                                                                           67
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91