Page 89 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education
P. 89

A Paradigm Shift for Teachers’ Professional Development Structure in Turkey




               Junor-Clarke, P. A., & Fournillier, J. B. (2012). Action research, pedagogy, and activity theory: Tools
               facilitating two instructors’ interpretations of the professional development of four preservice teachers.
               Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 649–660. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.013
               Kanli, U., & Yagbasan, R. (2001). In-service teacher training summer courses for physics teachers. Gazi
               University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 21(3), 39–46.
               Kennedy, M. (1998). The Relevance of Content in Inservice Teacher Education. San Diego, CA: Ameri-
               can Educational Research Association.

               Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for
               learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
               36(10), 1065–1084. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I

               Klein, B. S. (2001). Guidelines for effective elementary science teacher inservice education. Journal of
               Elementary Science Education, 13(2), 29–40. doi:10.1007/BF03176218

               Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2007). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Stud-
               ies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319–339. doi:10.1080/03075070600680786

               Loucks-Horsey, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for
               mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin at
               Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

               Loucks-Horsley,  S.  (1995).  Professional  development  and  the  learner  centered  school.  Theory  into
               Practice, 34(4), 265–271. doi:10.1080/00405849509543690
               Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional
               development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal
               of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534. doi:10.1080/09500690121307

               McCann, T. M., Alan, C. J., & Gail, A. (2012). Teaching matters Most, A School Leader’s Guide to
               improving classroom instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Sage.

               McDonald, M. (2003). The integration of social justice: Reshaping teacher education. (Unpublished
               doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
               Miaoulis, I. (2009). Engineering the K-12 curriculum for technological innovation. USA Today’s En-
               gineer Online.

               Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Nuffield
               Seminar Series: Interim Report V3.
               Millar, R., Osborne, J., & Nott, M. (1998). Science education for the future. The School Science Review,
               80(291), 19–25.

               MoNE. (2008). Teacher competencies: general and specific areas competencies for the teaching profes-
               sion. Ankara, Turkey: The Directorate of State Books.








               70
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94