Page 91 - Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education

A Paradigm Shift for Teachers’ Professional Development Structure in Turkey

Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1987). Teacher education from a constructivist perspective: The educa-
tional leaders in mathematics project. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation (TEI-8552391).
Smith, K. A., & Welliver, P. (2006). The development of a science process assessment for fourth‐grade
students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 727–738. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270803

State Planning Organization. (n.d.). The study of socio-economic development ranking of the provinces.
Retrieved from http://www.dpt.gov.tr/DPT.portal

Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching prac-
tices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980. doi:10.1002/1098-
2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
Tanriverdi, K., & Gunel, M. (2012). Ogretmen pedagojisinde kritik sorun: Degisime karsi direnc. Pa-
per presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of National Science and Mathematics Education Conference
(UFBMEK), Nigde.

Tanriverdi, K., Gunel, M., Asci, O., & Ocak, A. (2013). 365 day in-service training. Paper presented
at the 1st International Conference on Immersion Approaches to Argument-based Inquiry (ABI) for
Science Classrooms, Busan, Korea.

Thair, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). A brief history of a science teacher professional development ini-
tiative in Indonesia and the implications for centralised teacher development. International Journal of
Educational Development, 23(2), 201–213. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00014-7

The Holmes Group. (1996). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI:
The Holmes Group.
Wallance, C., Yang, E.-M., Hand, B., & Hohenshell, L. (2001). Using a science writing heuristic to
enhance learning from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: Quantitative and qualitative
outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science
Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA:
Open University Press.
Windschitd, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis
of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational
Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131

Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2014). Argumantasyon Tabanli Bilim Ogrenme Yaklasiminin (ATBO) Ogrencilerin
Fen Basarilari, Arguman Olusturma Becerileri ve Grup İci Etkilesimleri Uzerine Etkisi. (Unpublished
PhD thesis). Ataturk University.

Yesildag-Hasancebi, F., & Gunel, M. (2013). Effect of the argumentation based inquiry approach on
disadvantaged students’ science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 1056–1073.

Yesildag-Hasancebi, F., & Gunel, M. (2014). Delving into the effect of argumentation based inquiry
approach on learning science from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Education and Society,
1(1), 23–44.

72