Page 453 - Deep Learning
P. 453

436                    Notes to Pages 236–248

                Salas & Cannon-Bowers, 2001, pp. 488–489; Yamnill & McLean, 2001). However,
                training scientists appear to be no further along than laboratory psychologists or
                educational researchers to settle on standard measures or criteria for assessing
                transfer effects.
              42.  Although the term “inert ideas” was used by Alfred North Whitehead in his
                discussion of the aims of education (Whitehead, 1929/1967, pp. 1–2), the con-
                cept of inert knowledge was first given a cognitive formulation and intro-
                duced  into  discussions  of  transfer  by  Bereiter  and  Scardamalia  (1985);  see
                Bransford and Schwartz (1999) and Renkl, Mandl and Gruber (1996) for later
                developments.
              43.  See  Bransford  and  Schwartz  (1999)  for  the  proposal  that  transfer  should  be
                viewed as preparation for future learning. This concept is a close relative to the
                principle of transfer-appropriate processing (Morris, Bransford & Franks, 1977),
                which says that knowledge applies to a future situation only if it is encoded at
                the time of learning in a way that makes it relevant for that situation. This prin-
                ciple was already known in the memory literature as encoding specificity (Tulving,
                1985, Chap. 11; Tulving & Thomson, 1973). Lockhart (2002) has reviewed these
                concepts.
              44.  Newell (1990, pp. 102–107) has discussed this in terms of a trade-off between
                preparation and deliberation. In computer science, it is more commonly known
                as the store-versus-compute trade-off.
              45.  Gelman and Gallistel (1978).
              46.  Ohlsson (1993a, 2007a) and Ohlsson and Rees (1991a).
              47.  Ohlsson and Rees (1991a).
              48.  Gelman  (2000),  Gelman  and  Gallistel  (1978),  Gelman  and  Meck  (1983)  and
                Gelman,  Meck  and  Merkin  (1986).  Although  the  notion  of  special  cognitive
                structures for number has been questioned, there is considerable evidence in
                favor (Wynn, Bloom & Chiang, 2002).
              49.  The original report of the transfer simulations can be found in Ohlsson and Rees
                (1991a, 1991b). Further analysis of these data, including a mathematical equation
                specifying the expected amount of transfer, are reported in Ohlsson (2007a).
              50.  Bassok (1990) and Bassok and Holyoak (1989).
              51.  Warren (1965) concluded a review of the comparative psychology of learning by
                saying that the data “suggest an orderly improvement in the efficiency of learn-
                ing within the vertebrate series” (p. 110). The review by Moore (2004) provides
                additional support for this view.
              52.  Mithen (1996).
              53.  The view of the relation between instruction and learning that is captured in
                the Information Specificity Principle emerged out of Ohlsson (1983, 1986, 1988a,
                1990b, 1991, 1992g, 1993c, 1996b). See Ohlsson (2008a) for the original statement
                of the Specificity Principle.
              54.  See Ohlsson (1992g) and Ohlsson, Ernst and Rees (1992) for the main descrip-
                tion of this simulation exercise and Ohlsson (1992c) for some discussion points.
                VanLehn, Ohlsson and Nason (1994) reviewed this type of application of cogni-
                tive models.
              55.  Leinhardt (1987) and Leinhardt and Ohlsson (1990).
   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458