Page 454 - Deep Learning
P. 454

Notes to Pages 248–256                437

              56.  Brownell (1947) and Brownell and Moser (1949).
              57.  Regarding  the  amount  of  classroom  time  required  for  each  subtraction  with
                regrouping,  see  Leinhardt  (1987).  Regarding  estimates  of  learning  rate,  Kurt
                VanLehn  located  11  strategy  changes  in  a  90-minute  problem-solving  effort,
                indicating a rate of 1 learning event every 8 minutes (VanLehn, 1991). However,
                VanLehn (1999) observed a much lower rate of learning in an analysis of 9  students
                who spent an average of 4.5 hours studying a textbook chapter in physics. Only
                28 learning events were identified in the students’ verbal protocols, which gives
                the much lower rate of 1 event per 1.5 hours of studying. It is more likely that a
                learning event fails to leave any trace in a verbal protocol than that a seasoned
                researcher thinks he is seeing a nonexistent event, so the higher learning rate is
                likely to be the one closest to the truth.
              58.  Researchers who work on intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) form a commu-
                nity of their own, distinct from the broader field of computer-based education.
                ITS researchers have their own conferences and their own scientific journals.
                The ITS field came into its own in the late 1970s; the book edited by Sleeman
                and Brown (1982) was the defining document. Wenger (1987) reviewed the first
                wave of work. See Woolf (2009) for a recent appraisal of the field. The technical
                details of my own approach to ITS design are available in multiple research pub-
                lications (Buchanan et al., 1995; Fossati, Di Eugenio, Brown & Ohlsson, 2008;
                Langley, Wogulis & Ohlsson, 1990; Lu et al., 2007; Mitrovic & Ohlsson, 1999;
                Mitrovic,  Ohlsson  &  Martin, 2006;  Ohlsson,  1986,  1987c,  1991,  1992d,  1992h,
                1996b; Ohlsson & Langley, 1988; Ohlsson & Mitrovic, 2006, 2007).
              59.  The first paper on SQL-Tutor was Mitrovic and Ohlsson (1999). For descriptions
                and analyses of constraint-based tutors, see Mitrovic, Ohlsson and Martin (2006)
                and references in preceding Note 58 and Note 60 following.
             60.  See Mitrovic, Suraweera, Martin and Weerasinghe (2004) and Mitrovic, Martin
                and Suraweera (2007) for general discussions of the database suite. SQL-Tutor is
                described  in  Mitrovic,  Martin  and  Mayo  (2002),  while  Suraweera  and  Mitrovic
                (2004)  and  Mitrovic  (2002,  2005)  cover  database  design  and  normalization,
                respectively.
              61.  For empirical evaluations of constraint-based tutoring systems, see preceding
                Notes 58 and 59. For a study of the micro-engineering of a tutor’s feedback mes-
                sages, see Zakharov, Mitrovic and Ohlsson (2005).
              62.  Conway and Siegelman (2005).
              63.  Wiener (1948).


                        Chapter 8.  Error Correction in Context
              1.  Reason (1990, p. 203).
              2.  From “Prologue: A Tale of Two Farms,” from Collapse: How Societies Choose to
               Fail or Succeed by Jared Diamond, copyright © 2005 by Jared Diamond. Used by
               permission of Viking Penguin, a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
              3.  Chi, Glaser and Farr (1988), Ericsson (1996), Ericsson, Charness, Feltovich and
               Hoffman  (2006),  Ericsson,  Krampe  and  Tesch-Romber  (1993),  Ericsson  and
               Lehmann (1996) and Feltovich, Ford and Hoffman (1997).
   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459