Page 56 - Group Insurance and Retirement Benefit IC 83 E- Book
P. 56

imposed modifications to avoid duplication of benefits from public moneys. Regulations

                   under the National Health Service Act, 1946, imposed modifications in respect of local
                   Health Service staff; moreover, contributors transferred under that Act were empowered

                   to retain their former superannuation conditions.
                   The cumulative effect on the 'local-Act' fund with which he was concerned was startling.

                   In 1947 there were six sub varieties of pension scales and conditions, but the number of
                   possible  sub  varieties  in  that  one  fund  had  grown  to  no  less  than  136,  and  its

                   administration entailed reference to ten public general Acts and forty-two local ones, not

                   forgetting a wide range of Statutory Instruments and amending schemes. That increase in
                   complexity resulted entirely from statutory requirements. It might, of course, be claimed

                   that these arose from advances in superannuation methods and conditions; but they did

                   not assist practical administration, nor did they show any evidence of a reason approach
                   to the general question. As he saw it, the need was for a review of the whole field of

                   public  superannuation,  his  own  conclusion  being  that  the  introduction  of  a  generally
                   standardized scheme was long overdue.


                   The question of finance was a secondary consideration, since unified finance was by no

                   means essential, though obviously desirable in practice if it could be justified. Mr F. J.

                   Lloyd, in opening the discussion, said that the paper set out and discussed the various
                   superannuation schemes which covered members of the public services and employees of

                   the nationalized boards. While those schemes were of interest to all as tax payers, and to
                   some as actual or potential members, they were of particular interest to those actuaries

                   who  had  to  advise  on  the  many  problems  which  arose  in  day-to-day  administration.
                   Members and management, although partners in a superannuation fund, did not always

                   take  the  same  view—the  members  wished  to  secure  the  maximum  benefits  at  the

                   minimum cost to themselves; the management wished to provide reasonable benefits at a
                   reasonable cost. In those public funds, the members either paid contributions at a fixed

                   rate, or paid none at all, and the balance of the cost fell on the management.
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61