Page 61 - Group Insurance and Retirement Benefit IC 83 E- Book
P. 61

interest and experience or on the rates used at the last valuation of the fund? Should the

                   new employer grant past service benefits which were equivalent in value to the amount of
                   the transfer values, or should they be based on the number of years of past service? Mr A.

                   Farncombe found it difficult to see why lump sums should be paid on retirement rather
                   than at any other milestone in a man's life; lump sums on marriage, for example, would

                   be  socially  more  desirable.  The  cost  of  providing  adequate  pensions  was  proving  an
                   almost intolerable burden on private employers, and to attempt to compete with public

                   superannuation funds, equipped with lump sum payments and widows'.


                   The Development of Public Superannuation Schemes 25


                   Pensions, was virtually impossible. It was very surprising that public bodies, which were
                   not usually over-generous to their active staff, should treat their pensioners so well, and it

                   was also odd that, with public pension funds leading the way in the matter of lump sums,

                   the Government should discriminate against lump sums in private pension funds by its
                   taxation policy.

                   He was not sure that he agreed with the author that local authorities were so fond of their
                   pension funds as to oppose bitterly their absorption in a national fund. Their experience

                   had been somewhat unfortunate since the appointed day in 1939, and valuation reports
                   had  not  made  happy  reading  for  the  local  finance  committees.  Many  of  them  would

                   define a pension fund as something into which large contributions were paid every year,

                   and which produced a deficiency regularly every five years. In many cases the assets had
                   not been invested very remuneratively, and overworked borough treasurers must find the

                   administrative work very onerous. That state of affairs tended to react  on private self-
                   administered funds, and there was a well-authenticated story of a broker who, on reading

                   in the newspapers of a deficiency in a local government fund, cut out the reference and

                   used it to frighten his clients into life assurance schemes. Local authorities might well,
                   therefore, feel a sense of relief if faced with the early loss of their pension funds, but,

                   given a reasonable period of stable salaries and hardening interest rates, coupled with a
                   realization that there were other outlets for the investment of funds besides a very narrow

                   range  of  gilt-edged  securities  and  loans  to  the  authority  itself,  it  might  well  be  that

                   pension  funds  would  become  a  source  of  pride  to  the  authority.  Any  scheme  for  the
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66