Page 98 - Group Insurance and Retirement Benefit IC 83 E- Book
P. 98

are  at  work  in  a  continuing  scheme  causes  the  Single  Premium  cost  to  rise  more

                   gradually, and the Annual Premium cost to diminish more slowly, than would otherwise
                   be the case: in fact, it frequently happens that the point is never reached—or has not yet

                   been reached—at which the Annual Premium cost falls below the corresponding Single
                   Premium cost.


                   (3) Turnover

                   Employees leaving service generally have the option of taking either a refund of their

                   own  contributions  (sometimes  with,  but  more  usually  without  interest)  or  the  paid-up
                   pension purchased by their own contributions. In the latter case the pension secured by

                   the employer's premiums may be granted in addition. In most cases the employee elects

                   to take a refund, and the employer's paid-up pension is surrendered.


                   The paid-up pension secured by the employer's premiums is always greater with Annual
                   Premium costing than with Single Premium costing, and in the former case, when added

                   to the pension purchased by the employee's own contributions, always exceeds the scale
                   pension which has accrued. Unless the rules of the scheme require the excess paid-up

                   pension to be surrendered, the employer has paid for an unnecessarily high withdrawal

                   benefit in cases where the employee is entitled to the full paid-up pension. With Single
                   Premium costing, this situation does not occur.


                   Any surrender value to the employer is necessarily less than the full actuarial value of the

                   paid-up pension being surrendered.


                   For this reason, the Annual Premium method is more wasteful from the employer's point

                   of view than the Single Premium method. There is often no surrender value at all with
                   Single Premium costing in respect of an employee who withdraws below the age of, say,

                   30  because  no  pension  has  been  bought  by  the  employer,  the  employee's  own

                   contributions having been more than sufficient to secure his full scale accrued pension. In
                   such circumstances, however, the only profit to the Life Office is the difference between

                   the  full  actuarial  value  of  the  paid-up  pension  purchased  by  the  employee's  own
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103