Page 72 - Operations Strategy
P. 72

OPERATiOns PERfORmAnCE CAn mAKE OR bREAK Any ORgAnisATiOn  47

                      said BA’s boss Willie Walsh with magnificent understatement, ‘was not the company’s finest hour’.
                      The chaos at the terminal on its opening days made news around the world and was seen by
                      many as one of the most public failures of basic operations management in the modern his-
                      tory of aviation. ‘It’s a terrible, terrible PR nightmare’, said David Learmount, an aviation expert.
                      ‘Somebody . . . still not have their luggage after three weeks is not good for their [BA’s] image. The one
                      thing that’s worse than having a stack of 15,000 bags is adding 5,000 a day to that heap.’ According
                      to a BA spokeswoman, it needed an extra 400 volunteer staff and courier companies to wade
                      through the backlog of late baggage. Two hundred flights in and out of T5 had to be cancelled
                      in its first three days. The chaos delayed moving its long-haul operations to the new building
                      from Terminal 4 as scheduled on 30 April, which, in turn, disrupted the operations of other
                      airlines, many of whom were scheduled to move into Terminal 4 once BA had moved its long-
                      haul flights from there.
                        So what went wrong? As is often the case with major operations failures, it was not one thing
                      but several interrelated problems (all of which could have been avoided). Press reports initially
                      blamed glitches with the state-of-the-art baggage handling system. And, indeed, the baggage
                      handling system did experience problems that had not been exposed in testing. But BAA, the
                      airport operator, doubted that the main problem was the baggage system itself. The system
                      had worked until it became clogged with bags that were overwhelming BA’s handlers loading
                      them onto the aircraft. Partly this may have been because staff were not sufficiently familiar
                      with the new system and its operating processes, but handling staff had also suffered delays
                      getting to their new (and unfamiliar) work areas, negotiating (new) security checks and finding
                      (again, new) car parking spaces. Also, once staff were airside they had problems logging-in. The
                      cumulative effect of these problems meant that the airline was unable to get ground handling
                      staff to the correct locations for loading and unloading bags from the aircraft, so baggage could
                      not be loaded onto aircraft fast enough, so baggage backed up – clogging the baggage handling
                      system, which, in turn, meant closing baggage check-in and baggage drops, leading eventually
                      to baggage check-in being halted.
                        During the same year that Terminal 5 at Heathrow was suffering queues, lost bags and bad
                      publicity, Dubai International Airport’s Terminal 3 opened quietly with little publicity and
                      fewer problems. Like T5, it is also huge and designed to impress. Like T5, it handles about
                      30  million passengers a year.But Dubai’s T3 had one big advantage – it could observe and learn
                      lessons from the botched opening of Heathrow’s Terminal 5. Paul Griffiths, Dubai Airport’s
                      chief executive, insisted that his own new terminal should not be publicly shamed in the same
                      way. ‘There was a lot of arrogance and hubris around the opening of T5’, Mr Griffiths said. ‘The first
                      rule of customer service is under-promise and over-deliver because that way you get their loyalty. BA
                      was telling people that they were getting a glimpse of the future with T5, which created expectation and
                      increased the chances of disappointment. We knew the world would be watching and waiting after T5 to
                      see whether T3 was the next big terminal fiasco. We worked very hard to make sure that didn’t happen.’




                             performance at three levels
                             ‘Performance’ is not a straightforward or simple concept. First, it is multi-faceted in
                             the sense that a single measure can never fully communicate the success, or otherwise,
                             of something as complex as an operation. Several measures will always be needed to
                             convey a realistic overview of the various aspects of performance. Second, performance
                             can be assessed at different levels, from the broad, long-term, societal level, to the more
                             operational level concerns over how operations improve their day-to-day efficiency,










        M02 Operations Strategy 62492.indd   47                                                       02/03/2017   13:01
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77