Page 19 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 19

Ranah Studi Agraria

            A sample of 1100 farmers was selected in 37 sample villages in
            the major irrigated rice-producing areas of Indonesia (20 in
            Java, 13 in other islands) and re-visited at the end of each rice
            harvest season, for four years. There was no other systematic,

            multi-village study at this time, and the SAE series of “Research
            Notes”, written as soon as possible after the conclusion of each
            survey round and widely circulated in ‘stencil’ form, became
            the most important source of information on what was happe-
            ning in smallholder rice agriculture during these early years
            of the Bimas rice intensification programme.
                From the very first years foreign scholars were involved
            in the SAE’s work. One full-time consultant was provided by
            ADC and others came as short-term consultants; meanwhile
            many other scholars came to use SAE data and villages for
            their own research. One of the first of these was Richard Franke,
            whose Harvard University PhD The Green Revolution in a
            Javanese Village based on research in 1970-71 in a single SAE
            village in Pemalang, was one of the first English-language studies
            to point to the contradictions emerging when Bimas credit, new
            rice varieties and inputs came in contact with “village social
            relations of production” (Franke 1972; see also Franke 1974).
                The IPS project was, in its original conception, firmly

            production-oriented. The first rounds of the surveys covered
            only “farmers” (about 30 farmers per village, including a spe-
            cial sample of five “large farmers” per village) and were fo-
            cused on the problems of technology adoption. In 1971 howe-
            ver the project conducted an “agricultural census” of about
            200 households in each village, this time including the land-
            less. This census revealed the large numbers of households

            xviii
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24