Page 14 - Ranah Studi Agraria: Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris
P. 14

Kata Pengantar


               B. Beginnings 1963 – 1969: from Agrarian Reform to
                  “Getting Agriculture Moving”
                   Although many of us remember the SAE’s role during the
               first half of the Suharto ‘New Order’ regime, the SAE was actu-
               ally a creation of the last “years of living dangerously” of
               Sukarno’s ‘Old Order’. The SAE was established in 1965 by the
               Indonesian government “to compile data on and assess agri-

               cultural resources and the condition of rural society, and to
               evaluate programmes already in operation and their effects
               on agricultural production and rural society” (de Vries 1969:
               73).
                   Discussions on establishing the SAE has been held with
               the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation in 1963 but were
               inconclusive. In 1964 the government approached the Ford
               Foundation for assistance, which was originally provided
               through the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague under the
               coordination of the Institute’s Rector Professor Egbert de
               Vries. The SAE was formally established in February 1965,
               administered by a Working Body (Badan Kerja) chaired by
               Professor Kampto Utomo (Sajogyo). Within a few years more
               than one hundred university-based researchers, and another
               hundred fieldworkers (mainly students from agricultural facul-
               ties of IPB, UI, Unpad and UGM) had become recruited and
               involved in seventeen different research projects. Reflecting
               on the SAE’s first years, Professor de Vries pointed to the crea-
               tive and flexible organization created by Professor Sajogyo,
               based on ad hoc research teams with mixed composition,
               coming together to exchange ideas in periodic seminars. It is
               also interesting to note the three “hypotheses as fundamental

                                                                   xiii
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19